Illustration of Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy with neutral expressions on their faces

Pride and Prejudice

by Jane Austen

Start Free Trial

Discussion Topic

Feminism in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice

Summary:

Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice explores early feminist themes through its strong, independent female characters, particularly Elizabeth Bennet. Elizabeth challenges societal norms by asserting her right to marry for love rather than convenience or economic gain. The novel critiques the limited roles and expectations placed on women, highlighting the importance of personal agency and the pursuit of genuine happiness.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How does Pride and Prejudice portray women and address feminism? Is Elizabeth, the protagonist, a feminist? Does the novel aim to change women's social status?

In answer to your question, no, Elizabeth's refusal of Mr. Collins is not the only example. She also refuses Mr. Darcy at first and she does not actively seek a husband. We also see her beg Mr. Bennett to restrain the foolish behavior of a younger sister even though the sister is acting as many young girls during the time did. (of course, this is in reference to the young sister seeking a husband and trying to meet officers. This does not refer to her elopement which would not have been acceptable even then.) Elizabeth's thinking in general shows many concepts of feminism. Some of these ideas are revealed in contrast to other characters (like her mother) and some is revealed in conversations (like those with Lady Catherine de Bourg). Elizabeth isn't the only character who shows feminist ideals, but she is perhaps the most forward and outspoken. Her friend, Charlotte, seems to share her ideals but gives in to societal pressure. Her sister, Jane, also shares many of her ideals, but Jane is far more soft spoken and passive.
Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How does Pride and Prejudice portray women and address feminism? Is Elizabeth, the protagonist, a feminist? Does the novel aim to change women's social status?

I think that Austen was a feminist for her time.  She was careful in her portrayal of women.  Dickens, for example, often portrayed them as weak or stock characters, or villains.  Austen's women, as here, were often defying social convention.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How does Pride and Prejudice portray women and address feminism? Is Elizabeth, the protagonist, a feminist? Does the novel aim to change women's social status?

In Pride and Prejudice, we see some elements of feminism, especially in the lead character Elizabeth.  Society at the time was focused on marriage for women.  A woman's only means of support was to marry.  The women in the story are certainly focused on marriage, although they have different ideas about why a marriage should take place.  Consider that Elizabeth rejects Mr. Collins even though he is correct in suggesting "another offer of marriage may not be made to you."  Mrs. Bennet tries to force Elizabeth into the marriage because it will ensure Mr. Bennet's living stays within the family.  Elizabeth still refuses because she knows they will never get along.  It was very uncommon for a young woman to refuse an offer of marriage with so slight as reason as not likely her intended.  In this and many other ways, Elizabeth shows the beginning of feminism by suggesting that a woman is more than a wife and has a right to expect more of a husband.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How does Pride and Prejudice portray feminism?

I think a good place to start would be to look at feminism in terms of power for women.  Most women had no power then, except in marrying husbands.  Women did not inherit property or have many rights.  Therefore the issue of who marries who is actually quite critical.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Can you provide a feminist interpretation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice?

As a reader, you first read the story for the sake of the plot events and the style and themes of a work, but as that is happening, you may also consider alternative perspectives of a work.  When you do this, it is like you are standing a bit outside the text and looking at it through a specific lens to evaluate what is happening in the text.  You have been asked to look at this classic novel by Jane Austen to ask yourself, "What would a feminist say about this novel?  What is Austen intentionally, or unintentionally revealing about the place of women in society?"

Feminist criticism evaluates novels for what they illustrate about the role of women in society; how they struggle to be seen as independent individuals in a traditionally patriarchal society.  This criticism also evaluates the relationships between men and women.  Clearly this novel is a bounty for the reader who wants to create a feminist reading a novel.

The novel is dominated by female characters and focuses on their many varied attitudes about marriage.  This right there would draw the attention of feminist reader.  There are NO women in this novel who can or who are even interested in living an autonomous life outside the realm of marriage.  Getting married, for any number of additional motivations (love, financial security, sexual relations) is the primary subject of this novel.  Austen is drawing a picture of a society in which women are almost completely dependent on men for financial and emotional security.  While Elizabeth's quest for marriage for true love only is perhaps more admirable than Charlotte's practical attitude about marriage for financial security, it doesn't change the fact that Elizabeth would be absolutely destitute without a marriage of some sort.  Their father's estate is entitled to a MALE heir, and the daughters will all be literally out on the street if he should die before the girls are safely married.  (Or at least one of the girls be safely married to man of enough means who can support the unmarried sisters.)

To do a complete feminist reading of the novel, you will need to explore and prove the various similarities and differences the women in the novel have about marriage.  You could look at how the men treat the women -- what are their prejudices?  How do the men, ultimately, "hold all the cards?"  You could evaluate the strength of the female characters in comparison to the failings of the male characters -- looking specifically at Mr. Bennet, Mr. Collins, and Mr. Wickham.  You could think about the significance of the fact that this very satirical novel is written by a woman about the circumstances of women at the beginning of the 19th century.  This novel is filled with angles from which to explore what a feminist would notice or have to say about it.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Can you provide a feminist interpretation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice?

It is not difficult to develop a feminist reading of Pride and Prejudice. In it, Austen critiques a social system that leaves most women of the gentry with no reasonable economic alternative to marriage.

The system of primogeniture, in which inheritance passes down only through male hands, stacks the deck against the five Bennet sisters from the start. Because their parents never gave birth to a boy, their estate and its comfortable income will go to their cousin, Mr. Collins, upon their father's death. Their father married late in life, and if the girls do not marry, they will end up impoverished after he dies. Austen's novel implicitly (but never explicitly) questions why this is so: for what logical reason are the five daughters, who need the money more than Mr. Collins, a clergyman, passed over? A feminist reading would point out how unfair primogeniture was—and perhaps even note that earlier writers, like Richardson, spoke out against it (he does so in Sir Charles Grandison).

In a feminist reading, Mrs. Bennet's desperate quest to marry her daughters as quickly as she can to well-to-do men can be framed as less ridiculous than prudent. She knows that the alternative to marriage is poverty for her daughters, and she wants to protect them from that fate. Likewise, although Elizabeth is shocked and judgmental in response to her best friend's choice, in a world in which marriage has been made the only occupation with any kind of status or security for a woman, readers can easily understand Charlotte Lucas's hardheaded decision to marry Mr. Collins. He is a man who can provide for her, even if she does not love him.

Lydia's desperate situation when she runs off with Wickham illustrates the sexual double standard in operation during this time. She will be ruined and her family will be disgraced if Wickham does not marry her; Wickham, however, would get off for abandoning her with a mere slap on the wrist.

Finally, while the witty and assertive Elizabeth manages to marry for love—or at least a man she can esteem—she also understands the economic value of being mistress of Pemberley. Even for someone as talented as she is, marriage is her one and only way up the social ladder.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Can you provide a feminist interpretation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice?

Post-colonial literature is a term that describes literature written after a country’s colonial period.  It typically describes how a new country is formed, and recovers from the legacy of colonialism.  Pride and Prejudice, on the other hand, is novel of Victorian England.  While England itself was never a colony, it did have many colonies in Africa, Asia and the Americas.  Many of the ideas of Victorian England were imposed upon some of these colonies of Great Britain.  For example, ideas relating to property and marriage were brought over. 

Pride and Prejudice describes issues of social class, especially related to property and marriage.  Social class and marrying to improve one’s fortune were just as common among the expatriates who traveled from Victorian England to its various colonies.  They brought their prejudices, ideas and traditions with them.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Can you provide a feminist interpretation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice?

Realistically, Pride and Prejudice is the novel of Austen's least susceptible to post-colonial analysis. To apply a post-colonial reading to it is more an exercise in critical ingenuity than a major contribution to our understanding of the novel. The main entry points into the novel for the post-colonial critic are the episodes involving the military. It is possible to analyze Lydia's complicity with her own abduction by Wickham as parallel to the complicity of women in countries colonized by the British in having relationships with their opressors in the British military. Another line of analysis would be to look at Austen's metaphorical descriptions of balls as battles and argue that Britain's external colonialism and militarization affected its internal gender relations by reframing class and gender within the ideological structure of strategic and militarized oppression.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Attempt a post colonial reading of Pride And Prejudice.

This is a very interesting question. I am sure that we can say a lot of things, but here is my attempt at your very good question. Perhaps we can say that the dominant society is the colonial power. In this instance, we can say that men and the social structure that they have created is the dominant power in view. They are the ones who are spinning the ideology of what is proper. The colonized, then, are the women. But here is the twist. The colonized see through the power dynamics and they now begining to challenge it and even having some success. Good luck.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on