Editor's Choice
What are the pros and cons of one-officer versus two-officer patrols?
Quick answer:
Two-officer patrols are generally more effective in policing, as they enhance observation, safety, and suspect apprehension. The presence of two officers allows one to focus on driving while the other remains vigilant, and they can support each other in dangerous situations. However, due to budget constraints, many cities opt for one-officer patrols, which, while less effective, enable a broader police presence across more areas, maximizing limited resources.
In an ideal world, patrol cars would have two officers in them. However, in this world of limited budgets for police forces, it is often the case that one-officer patrols are inevitable.
In terms of policing, two-officer patrols are superior. If there are two officers in a car, they can see many more things than if there is only one officer. A single officer has to concentrate on driving and will therefore miss many things. With another officer in the car, this is less of a problem. If there are two officers in the car, there is greater safety for the officers and more ability to apprehend suspects. If a single officer pulls up to a crime scene, more suspects can escape than if there are two. Two officers can also back one another up when entering a dangerous situation.
However, in the budget situation that most cities face, two-officer patrols are much harder to implement. This means that police departments end up with one-officer patrols. In this environment, the good point of one-officer patrols is that they allow a department with limited funds to have at least some police presence in more parts of a city at more times.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.