Peter Handke Criticism

Peter Handke, born in 1942 in Austria, is a seminal figure in postmodern literature, known for his profound impact on German-language works through an extensive repertoire of novels, plays, poetry, and essays. His early career was marked by experimental theatrical "Sprechstücke" that challenge traditional conventions, exemplified by Offending the Audience (1966), where actors blur the lines between performers and viewers, emphasizing the participatory nature of theater, as noted by Nicholas Hern. This approach underscores a central theme in Handke's work: the insufficiency of language as a vehicle for genuine communication, which is vividly illustrated in his "speak-ins," pieces that lack traditional drama structure and highlight language's obstructive potential.

Handke's critical exploration of language continues in Kaspar (1968), a play delving into the connection between language and identity, as discussed by David Barnett. This work, alongside Self-Accusation and Calling for Help, illustrates Handke's focus on how linguistic acquisition can strip individuals of their uniqueness, as further explored by Richard Arthur Firda in Theatrical Experiments. Despite some perceptions of abstraction, these plays are celebrated for their cerebral insights and have significantly influenced modern drama.

Handke's literary evolution is notable, shifting from deconstructive themes of alienation to those of self-discovery and inner transformation, as discussed by Linda C. DeMeritt. His mature works, such as My Year in the No-Man's Bay, venture into themes of connectivity and introspection, praised for their narrative complexity. Handke's approach to language as both a barrier and a medium of profound connection is evident in The Afternoon of a Writer, celebrated by critics like Ursula Hegi and Mark Kamine.

Nevertheless, not all Handke's works have been favorably received. The Hour We Knew Nothing of Each Other was criticized for its lack of dialogue, noted in the Times Literary Supplement, while A Journey to the Rivers sparked controversy for its perceived apologetic stance on Serbian politics, attracting criticism from reviewers like David Rieff. Such debates confirm Handke's role as a provocative voice in contemporary literature.

Handke's engagement with myth and language is further exemplified in works like Das Spiel vom Fragen, where he integrates mythological elements to create fairy tale-like narratives, as explored by Eva-Maria Metcalf. These explorations challenge the boundaries of theater and encourage audiences to reconsider the essence and function of language, affirming Handke's position as a pivotal figure in contemporary literature. Despite criticisms from figures like James Wolcott and Ferdinand Mount, who question the emotional depth of certain works, Handke's exploration of language, identity, and perception continues to provoke thought and discussion in literary circles.

Read Full Introduction

Peter Handke Criticism

Contents