Student Question
What is flunkeyism in Thackeray's works and Miltonic inversion in Paradise Lost?
Quick answer:
Flunkeyism in W. M. Thackeray's works is the name given to excessively deferential treatment to members of the upper-classes. In his celebrated articles in Punch magazine, Thackeray satirized the behavior of those who bowed and scraped before their alleged social betters. Miltonic inversion in Paradise Lost is the inversion of the natural word order. We have “darkness visible” instead of “visible darkness,” for example. Here, the emphasis is on the darkness of hell rather than its visibility.
William Makepeace Thackeray first came to the general public’s attention with a series of humorous articles in Punch magazine, entitled “The Snobs of England, by one of themselves.” In these articles, Thackeray sought to satirize the behavior of the upper classes and those flunkeys who fawned over them.
At a time when English society was changing and when wealth was becoming more important in some quarters than class, Thackeray sought to mock what he saw as the unhealthy obsession among too many of his fellow Englishmen with rank and position. Such “flunkeyism” as he called it was positively degrading and had no place in a society where the deferential principle was no longer as strong as it had been only a quarter of a century earlier. Thackeray’s Punch essays can, therefore, be seen as a reflection of a marked societal trend in the early years of Victorian Britain.
Miltonic inversions, as displayed throughout Paradise Lost, involves inverting natural word order for effect. The most obvious example would be Milton’s description of Hell as “darkness visible”. The normal word order would be “visible darkness,” but Milton inverts this order because he wants to emphasize the darkness of hell rather than its visibility.
Another example of Miltonic inversion in Paradise Lost comes in book 3, when God greets Jesus as “Son beloved,” not “Beloved Son,” as one might expect. Again, this alerts us to which particular quality is being emphasized. In this case, it’s Christ’s being a son that matters here rather than his being beloved.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.