Pagans and Christians
There is an admonition from historian Herbert Butterfield that the task of the historian is not to study the origins of things but to analyze how the past came to be our present. Pagans and Christians is a monumental analysis of the transition from the pagan Roman world to the Christian empire. Robin Lane Fox sets for himself the difficult and at times all but impossible task of re-creating the feel and force behind pagan culture in the second and third centuries. To this he adds a comprehensive view of the nascent Christian culture and a reevaluation of the significance of Constantine’s conversion, presenting a challenge to the traditional historical view that Christianity met deep-seated needs among the people that the dying Greek and Roman gods could not fill. Lane Fox maintains that pagan (that is, nondoctrinal and nonorthodox from a Christian perspective) religion was far from decaying in the century leading up to Constantine and that the Christian triumph said more about the nature of Christianity than about any lack in paganism.
Part 1 describes life in the pagan empire, especially as it centered on civic duty and cultic ritual. Part 2 details the spread (not necessarily the numerical expansion) of Christianity, and part 3 traces the centrality of Constantine in the rise of the Church and the change from a pagan to a Christian culture.
Much of the archaeological evidence the author considers did not exist a mere lifetime ago. A study of epigraphs or inscriptions now enables the historian to trace an individual’s movements over a period of decades and to build a picture of how city life changed in the empire by the changing nature of the inscriptions (especially those in connection with the oracular temples). Lane Fox’s findings allow him to take issue with Plutarch, who lamented the decline of the oracle texts in verse (sometime around the first decades of the second century) and their replacement by simplistic and unambiguous responses from the gods. That, said Plutarch, served only to undermine the popular belief in the inspiration of the oracles. People no longer inquired about the great questions of state, but only about plagues and famines, where simple or vague replies were all that was needed. Where was the Homeric grandeur of old?
Plutarch’s writings have been taken as evidence that with the corresponding rise of Christianity the old pagan religion was losing its hold. Yet Lane Fox maintains that even in the imperial period paganism flourished. He explains the loss of Homeric ambiguity, seemingly abundant in the classic age of Herodotus, by suggesting that the oracles of the classic age may have survived in texts mainly as literary fictions and that the use of riddles and Homeric poetry by the oracles may well be overestimated. The author points out that loss of literary quality reflects changing social contexts, not the loss of pagan religiosity. Since the function of pagan religion was to respond to the fears of the people (and polytheism could always supply a god who needed placating), nothing of great literary value or complexity was required. Apollo the oracle mirrored his time. In the second and third centuries, the prophets who spoke for the god still reveled in puns and genealogies. At Delphi in central Greece, Apollo sounded Platonic, as he did at Didyma (outside Miletus) and at Claros (in eastern Greece, where some three hundred civic inscriptions at the temple have been found). The cult (or worship) of Glycon, a shaggy snake, was another story. His oracle emerged in the 150’s in a small town on the southern coast of the Black Sea. The snake would consult with his prophet, Alexander. There were those who ridiculed the whole affair, yet it appears that Glycon was consulted for some thirty years (much too long for Alexander to be a simple fraud) and that in Glycon, Alexander had merely introduced a new form of the cult of Asclepius (son of Apollo and god of medicine). The shedding of the snake’s...
(The entire section is 3,287 words.)