To discuss the individual in relation to his or her society, Bourdieu uses the term habitus. The habitus refers to the composition of a person's symbolic resources in the form of economic, social, or cultural capital. One's habitus will determine his or her disposition in a variety of fields. It naturally interfaces within the fields into which an individual enters (such fields include the workplace, school, and family). One's habitus is, in turn, transformed when an individual is integrated into a field.

According to Bourdieu, a "scheme" is a part of a practice, the mastery of which works structurally to form culturally-coded ceremonies. Ceremonies are simply a collection of schemes that have been imbued with meaning by virtue of being practiced over and over again. The schemes that one practices is in fact determined by one's habitus and so persists in its meaning across diverse contexts. Simply put, a scheme is a practice that has become symbolic by means of mastery and repetition.

Power is closely related to capital, which may be cultural, economic, or social. These various types of capital collectively represent a symbolic capital, which ultimately determines one's power. These types of capital depend on where one was educated, whom one knows, how much money he or she has. Because symbolic capital can be converted back to economic capital (according to Bourdieau), individuals invest heavily in accruing this capital. Symbolic capital is equivalent to one's power, and the doxa is the natural state wherein the powerful tend to remain powerful, and the institutions that cement this power go unquestioned.