Student Question
How can the poem "On Killing a Tree" be interpreted as a protest?
Quick answer:
The poem "On Killing a Tree" can be interpreted as a protest against environmental destruction due to urban expansion. Gieve Patel uses the imagery of uprooting a tree to symbolize the violent and irreversible impact of human development on nature. The poem argues that nature's rights to the land are as legitimate as those of humans, and it criticizes the perception of nature as an obstacle to progress, highlighting the destructive consequences of such actions.
Gieve Patel, the author of “On Killing a Tree,” grew up in Mumbai, India. India gained its independence in 1947 and the 1960s saw the city of Mumbai expand rapidly into an urban metropolis. Using this background for context, one can read Patel’s poem as an environmental protest against urban expansion. He seems to be arguing that Mother Nature’s claims to the land are just as valid as any human’s. It takes immense effort to fully uproot a tree, and once destroyed, nature never returns to the way it once was. Patel seems to lament the idea that nature is viewed as an inconvenient enemy to urban sprawl, and that it has to be treated with complete, surgical extraction, like a pest infestation or a cancer. Patel’s imagery of genocidal “scorching and choking” seems to be a strong protest against destroying Mother Nature’s defenseless presence.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.