Oedipus as an Aristotelian Tragic Hero
In 335 BCE, Aristotle published Poetics, a tract in which he describes the ideal form and function of a Greek tragedy. In Aristotle’s eyes, a good tragic hero must begin the story at a high point and end it at a low one. The hero must be brought low by their own hamartia, or tragic flaw, rather than through the machinations of a villain. Finally, they must confront their tragic flaw in order for the audience to experience catharsis, a spiritual and emotional relief. Aristotle references Oedipus Rex throughout his treatise as a paragon of tragedy. Specifically, Sophocles’s depiction of Oedipus as a character fits nearly perfectly with Aristotle’s definition of the ideal tragic hero.
Oedipus begins the play at a high point: he is a highly respected king who is beloved by his people; he is happily married with several adoring children; and he is confident in himself and in his own abilities. However, he is brought low by his own tragic flaw. By the end of the play, he has lost his crown, his family, and his belief in himself. In Oedipus’s case, his tragic flaw proves to be hubris, or the belief in the ability of mortals to defy the will of the gods. Laius, Jocasta, and Oedipus all suffer from this flaw by attempting to circumvent the prophecy that foretells Oedipus’s patricide and incest. The catharsis, or emotional cleansing for the audience, comes as Oedipus learns the truth about his parentage and accepts his fate.
Dramatic irony is pervasive in Oedipus Rex. Dramatic irony is a device whereby the audience understands the significance of a character’s words or actions but the character does not. The entire premise of the play is based on Oedipus’s ignorance of his parentage and, by extension, the fact that he has killed his father and married his mother. Audiences begin to suspect the tragic truth of Oedipus’s life far earlier than he does. For the original Greek audiences, Oedipus’s story would have already been well known. This foreknowledge enhances the dramatic irony, since the audience does not need to wait for the clues that Oedipus receives.
Throughout the play, Oedipus makes accusations and promises that end up being tragically ironic. When told that the only way to end the plague is to exile or execute Laius’s murderer, Oedipus worries that the murderer may come after him next. He vows to find and punish the murderer and declares that if he were to ever welcome the murderer into his home, then he too should be punished. The ultimate bout of irony arrives when Oedipus accuses Teiresias of the murder. All of these instances reinforce Oedipus’s ignorance, deepening the tragedy of the eventual revelation surrounding his true parentage. Denied the information that might have saved him from his tragic fate, Oedipus unknowingly committed several horrific acts. The audience can only pityingly watch as Oedipus determinedly pursues the information that will bring about his ruin and reveal the tragedy to...
(The entire section is 3,574 words.)