Themes and Meanings
This poem’s vitality comes partially from its joining together of the personal, the political, and the historical or mythical worlds. Yeats was a poet who was deeply involved in his country’s movement to cultural, if not political, independence from Great Britain, and his work is strengthened by this involvement. He, as is evidenced in this poem, managed to include his own love life in his poetry, without excluding the larger social and mythic realms. Perhaps he is offering a recipe for great poetry in this poem: Create a unified whole by mixing personal obsessions with the power of contemporary events, but do not forget the timeless world of myth.
Although this is, on one level, a love poem, it also contains many of Yeats’s political views, partially because his love—Maude Gonne—was a very active, political person. Even though Yeats was in love with Gonne, he was not in love with her political activism. Given the opportunity, Gonne “would of late/ Have taught to ignorant men most violent ways,/ Or hurled the little streets upon the great.” Yeats, as is clear from his word choice, opposes such action; it is equivalent to filling his “days/ With misery.” Yeats was troubled by Gonne’s involvement in nationalist and working-class organizations that espoused violence as a method to achieve political ends. Yeats shows his hand very clearly by calling those involved in these organizations “ignorant men.” He questions not only their...
(The entire section is 600 words.)