Themes: Deceptive Appearances
Mathilde spends her years of beauty longing for a lifestyle of extravagance. When she is presented with true gems at Madame Forestier’s, including a pearl necklace and “precious stones of admirable workmanship,” Mathilde dismisses them because she believes they are unable to fully represent her sense of self-worth. Ironically, she chooses a “superb necklace of diamonds” which fulfills her definition of exquisite beauty because she believes it to be the most expensive and elegant choice. She is so thrilled with her decision that she is “lost in ecstasy” when she beholds it around her neck. This necklace which fulfills Mathilde’s sense of beauty and lavish projections is, however, a fake. The diamonds aren’t real, yet Mathilde believes that they are. Mathilde has based her entire sense of self-worth on ideals of wealth and status, yet in the decision which completely changes the trajectory of her life, she proves unable to distinguish between true treasures and worthless replicas. Mathilde’s own personality is much the same. On the dance floor, she triumphs, feeling herself fully alive only because she believes the dress and jewelry she wears make her beautiful. Yet it is all a façade. Mathilde is indeed an attractive woman; the opening sentence notes that “she was one of those pretty and charming girls.” She doesn’t need an expensive dress or elegant jewelry to make her beautiful, but she is blind to this truth. Mathilde’s predilection for a flashy and lavish lifestyle ends with her great deception, as she is unable to ultimately gauge the true worth of the very things she admires most.
Expert Q&A
Why is Mme. Forestier's revelation that the necklace was fake ironic?
Mme. Forestier's revelation that the necklace was fake is ironic because Madame Loisel spent ten years in poverty to replace it, only to discover it was worthless. This twist emphasizes the futility of her sacrifices and highlights the disparity between appearances and reality, as she lost her beauty and social standing in the pursuit of replacing something that had no real value.
Analyze this statement in the context of the short story "The Necklace".
The statement in the context of "The Necklace" can be analyzed as a commentary on the protagonist's transformation and the irony of her situation. Mathilde's loss of the necklace forced her to abandon her materialistic lifestyle and learn the value of hard work and self-pride. However, her downfall was her own pettiness and inability to be content or honest. The cruel irony is her sacrifice for a necklace that turned out to be worthless, underscoring the futility of her former materialistic values.
What is the meaning of this quote from "The Necklace"?
She was one of those pretty and charming girls born as if by an accident of fate into a family of clerks. With no dowry, no prospects, no way of any kind of being met, understood, loved and married by a man both prosperous and famous she was finally married to a minor clerk in the Ministry of Education.
The quote from "The Necklace" reflects the protagonist Mathilde Loisel's discontentment with her humble origins and social station which contrast her natural beauty and manners. Despite her qualities, Mathilde's lack of dowry and prospects limit her to marrying within her own class, leading to her dissatisfaction and daydreams of a better life. The quote also highlights Maupassant's ironic commentary on Mathilde's unrealistic desires for a higher social status.
Why didn't Mathilde admit to losing the necklace in "The Necklace"?
Mathilde did not admit to losing the necklace due to her pride and embarrassment. She longed for a life of wealth and was thrilled to wear a borrowed "diamond" necklace to a ball. Upon losing it, she and her husband decided to replace it secretly, incurring significant debt. This decision stemmed from pride and the hope of averting immediate shame. Had they confessed, they would have discovered the necklace was a fake, avoiding years of hardship.
What justifies the title "The Diamond Necklace"?
The title "The Diamond Necklace" is justified as the necklace serves as the antagonist, causing all the conflict for Madame Loisel. Her shallow love of material possessions leads to the loss of the necklace, resulting in ten years of hard labor to repay debts. Ironically, the necklace was fake, and the Loisels replaced it with a real one, highlighting the futility of their sacrifice.
Why did Mme. Forestier in "The Necklace" own a fake necklace and not inform Mme. Loisel about its authenticity?
Madame Forestier owned a fake necklace possibly because she wanted to allow Mathilde to feel special without risking a valuable item. She might have assumed Mathilde knew it was fake or believed it unnecessary to disclose its authenticity. Madame Forestier's surprise at Mathilde's reaction suggests she didn't anticipate the misunderstanding. The story illustrates themes of class differences and assumptions, with Mathilde's pride and deception leading to her financial ruin.
What does the quote and ironic tone suggest about life's complexity in "The Necklace"?
The quote and ironic tone in "The Necklace" highlight life's complexity by underscoring how small actions can lead to significant consequences. Madame Loisel's decision to replace a lost necklace, believed to be valuable, results in years of hardship, only to later learn it was costume jewelry. This irony suggests that pride and material desires can lead to one's downfall, emphasizing how seemingly minor decisions can dramatically alter the course of life.
Is "The Necklace" about the futility of trying to keep up appearances?
"The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant highlights the futility of trying to maintain appearances through Mathilde Loisel's experience. Her desire to impress others at a ball leads her to borrow a necklace, which she loses, resulting in a decade of financial hardship to replace it. Ultimately, she discovers the necklace was a fake, underscoring how her obsession with appearances caused unnecessary suffering and wasted years.
What does the couple learn about the necklace?
The couple learns that the necklace they borrowed and replaced at great expense was actually a fake. After losing the necklace, they had bought a replacement for 40,000 francs, leading them into poverty for ten years to pay off the debt. In a twist of irony, Madame Forestier reveals that the original necklace was not made of real diamonds, highlighting themes of appearance versus reality and the dangers of vanity and materialism.
What does the necklace symbolize in Maupassant's story, and what techniques does he use?
The necklace symbolizes Mathilde's pride and materialistic nature, leading to her downfall and illustrating the futility of materialism. Maupassant employs a limited third-person narrator to enhance tension and surprise, while also using symbolism, irony, and a fable-like structure to convey a moral lesson. This combination of techniques emphasizes the theme that vanity and the pursuit of superficial beauty can result in unhappiness and ruin.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
