What are the ethics of using one sibling as a body supplier for another in My Sister's Keeper?
In My Sister's Keeper, Jodi Picoult brings up an extremely important ethical issue, namely whether it is acceptable to conceive a child and use that child primarily as a supplier or resource for that child's sibling.
Brian and Sara Fitzgerald deliberately conceive their daughter Anna to be a genetic...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
match for their older daughter, Kate, who has leukemia and needs a bone marrow transplant. No one else in the family is a match, so the Fitzgeralds design their next child accordingly. There are major ethical concerns here because the Fitzgeralds also had to reject other embryos when they chose Anna. We might wonder what happened to those tiny human beings.
Furthermore, there is the issue of Anna's human dignity and freedom. For her whole life, she seemed to exist not for her own person but for Kate. She has been put through many procedures; some of them quite painful in order to donate what her sister needs. Anna is not being treated as a person in her own right but rather as a resource for Kate. Kate has always seemed to take priority among the Fitzgerald children.
When Anna turns thirteen, her parents expect her to give Kate a kidney. Anna also faces many restrictions in her life. She wants to play hockey, for instance, but cannot because it might damage her body in some way so she won't be as useful to her sister. Anna, therefore, sues for medical emancipation from her parents. She does not want them to choose how to use her body any longer because their choice never seems to be about Anna's good but always about Kate. Anna wants to be treated as a person, not a biological supplier.