Murder in Amsterdam

by Ian Buruma

Start Free Trial

Editor's Choice

What is the outcome of the fundamentalism vs. enlightenment debate in Buruma's novel?

Quick answer:

The outcome of the fundamentalism vs. enlightenment debate in Ian Buruma's Murder in Amsterdam is not a definitive resolution but rather an exploration of deep cultural conflicts. The book highlights the tension between traditional Islamic values and Western Enlightenment ideals, exacerbated by demographic changes in the Netherlands. Buruma calls for reason and moderation, acknowledging the complexity and ongoing nature of the conflict without offering a clear solution.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Murder in Amsterdam, Ian Buruma's book-length essay on the cultural conflict which resulted in the gruesome 2004 murder of Dutch filmmaker-provocateur Theo Van Gogh, is much less a debate between fundamentalist religious values and those of the Enlightenment, than a subtle exploration of an issue that has seized the center stage of global politics in recent years.

In retrospect, the odds of such an outcome seems all but inevitable in light of the magnitude of the chasm between killer and victim. Van Gogh, a self-described "national village idiot," was the co-director of an agitprop film, which featured shots of passages from the Qur'an superimposed on the bodies of naked women. Muhammad Bouyeri, a second-generation Moroccan Muslim, was deeply alienated from his surroundings in the most tolerant democracy in the Western world; a society in which sex and drugs were readily available, and in which the Islamic principle of male dominance over women was non-existent. Indeed, it seems likely that the new sexual freedom of his sister may have contributed to pushing him towards such a heinous act.

Buruma, himself a Dutch national, reflects on the history of a nation that had been at the center of the Enlightenment, and has long prided itself on its tradition of tolerance; a tradition strengthened by the memory of the Holocaust. But, in a country nearly half of whose citizens are now of foreign origin, many from the world of traditional Islam, that tradition is being pushed to the breaking point. For many of the latter group, the absence of a culture of rigorous restrictions in which social and political life are completely penetrated with religious belief is a constant existential threat.

The author interviews a number of his fellow citizens, natives and immigrants alike, with empathy for those on both sides of the issue. But, as one might have guessed, he is unable to offer any clear solution, aside from a call for reason and moderation, to a conflict which continues to be a source of global tragedy.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial