Themes: The Distinction Between Humans and Animals
The most prominent theme in Connell's story concerns the perceived line between animals and humans. This line is examined with regards to ethical questions around the hunting and killing of animals: Is it ethical for animals to be hunted? Are animals lesser beings who cannot think or feel to the extent that humans can? Is it any more ethical to kill animals than it would be to kill humans?
The trajectory of Raisnford’s views on these questions is ambiguous. It is unclear whether he has become a more open-minded person through having understood the fear that animals feel, or a worse one for having been encouraged to abandon his principles and kill Zaroff. At the beginning of the story, a debate ensues between Rainsford and his hunting companion, Whitney, who contends that even the jaguar can feel the fear of pain and the fear of death. Rainsford dismisses this idea as "soft." When he later encounters Zaroff and realizes that the general’s "most dangerous game" is man-hunting, he is horrified, saying that he is no "murderer" and will not take part in such a contest. However, Zaroff's argument is that it is actually more unethical to kill animals than it is to kill humans, because animals cannot reason. Hunting animals, according to Zaroff, is not a game at all, but simple killing, whereas hunting a rational human being poses a proper challenge against a foe who could reasonably win. Having shown Rainsford his collection of animal heads, he offers to show him his "new" collection of human ones, too. Rainsford declines, horrified by the idea. Rainsford is also perhaps unnerved by the fact that Zaroff seems to see little difference between the value of an animal life and the value of a human one.
It is difficult to unambiguously deem one viewpoint evil and the other good. Rainsford himself is a hunter, a man whose "sport" involves animal cruelty. It is arguably fitting that he should learn, through being hunted, how an animal feels when he stalks it to his death. Meanwhile, Zaroff has certainly killed animals in the past, but now he seems to feel that there is something distasteful about killing a being so less capable of reasoning than himself. At the end of the story, Zaroff is proven correct in his belief that a human could actually beat him at his own game. Meanwhile, Rainsford has overcome his scruples sufficiently to kill Zaroff; he has become a "murderer." But he has also potentially understood the cruelty he enacts on animals when he hunts them.
Expert Q&A
How would you interpret this quote from "The Most Dangerous Game": "the world is made up of two classes- the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and I are hunters."
The quote from "The Most Dangerous Game" signifies the main character, Sanger Rainsford's lack of empathy for animals, classifying the world into predators and prey. This statement foreshadows the plot as Rainsford, initially a hunter, becomes the hunted after falling overboard and landing on General Zaroff's island. His experience as the prey offers him a new perspective, replacing his previous apathy with empathy.
In "The Most Dangerous Game," what are the General's three reasons for considering a person the "ideal animal to hunt"?
General Zaroff considers humans the ideal animal to hunt because they possess courage, cunning, and the ability to reason. These traits make humans more challenging and exciting to hunt compared to animals, which rely on instinct alone. Zaroff believes that humans' logical thinking and deceptive capabilities offer a more thrilling hunt, as they can intellectually compete with him, providing the challenge he seeks in his diabolical sport.
What does Zarroff mean by "Instinct is no match for reason," and do you agree or disagree with this statement?
General Zaroff's statement "Instinct is no match for reason" suggests that human reasoning surpasses animal instincts, making humans superior hunters. This view is supported by examples of human achievements, such as building in harsh environments and hunting animals to near extinction, like black rhinos and Bengal tigers. Humans, despite lacking physical prowess, dominate due to reasoning abilities, occupying the top of the food chain. Agreeing with Zaroff, reason typically overcomes instinct.
Comparison of Rainsford and Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game"
In Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game," Rainsford and Zaroff are both skilled and passionate hunters, sharing a hierarchical worldview that distinguishes between hunters and the hunted. However, they differ significantly in their morality. Rainsford sees hunting humans as murder, while Zaroff, bored with traditional game, finds excitement in hunting people. This difference highlights Zaroff's psychopathy and Rainsford's adherence to societal norms. Despite their shared expertise, Rainsford's experience as prey leads to a transformation, challenging his initial perspective on hunting.
Rainsford's attitude towards the feelings of the animals he hunts
At the beginning of "The Most Dangerous Game," Rainsford dismisses the idea that animals experience fear or pain, considering them incapable of complex emotions. However, his perspective shifts dramatically after he becomes the hunted, leading him to empathize with the terror and suffering of his prey.
Differences in hunting attitudes between Rainsford and Whitney in "The Most Dangerous Game"
Rainsford and Whitney differ in their hunting attitudes. Rainsford views hunting as a sport and dismisses the prey's feelings, seeing animals as unfeeling. In contrast, Whitney shows empathy, suggesting that hunted animals experience fear and pain. This difference highlights Rainsford's initial lack of compassion, which is challenged later in the story.
Rainsford's evolving understanding of hunted animals' feelings in "The Most Dangerous Game."
In Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game," Rainsford's initial views on hunting are dismissive of prey's feelings, seeing hunting as a sport without considering animal emotions. However, his perspective evolves after he experiences being hunted by General Zaroff. This role reversal leads him to empathize with prey, understanding fear and vulnerability. Despite this, the story concludes ambiguously, leaving it unclear if Rainsford truly changes, as he ultimately kills Zaroff and sleeps peacefully, suggesting a complex transformation.
Instinct vs. Reason in "The Most Dangerous Game"
In Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game," the theme of instinct versus reason is pivotal. General Zaroff believes human reason surpasses animal instinct, prompting him to hunt humans for a greater challenge. However, the story reveals the complexity of this belief. Rainsford, the protagonist, uses both reason to set traps and instinct to survive, ultimately defeating Zaroff by diving off a cliff, a move Zaroff couldn't predict. This underscores that while reason is crucial, instinct plays a vital role in survival.
Rainsford's perspective on the two classes in "The Most Dangerous Game" and its reflection in the story
Rainsford's perspective on the two classes—the hunters and the hunted—reflects the story's main conflict. Initially, Rainsford sees himself as a hunter, superior and detached from the prey. However, when he becomes the hunted, he experiences the fear and vulnerability of his prey, leading to a profound shift in his understanding of these roles.
What is the double meaning of "game" in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game"?
In "The Most Dangerous Game," the term "game" has a dual meaning. It refers to both the hunted animal and the activity or contest of hunting. General Zaroff hunts humans, considering them the most dangerous "game" due to their intelligence and survival instincts. Meanwhile, the "game" also implies the deadly contest between Zaroff and Rainsford, where Rainsford must outwit Zaroff to survive, illustrating the perilous nature of this "game."
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
