silhouette of a man with one eye open hiding in the jungle

The Most Dangerous Game

by Richard Edward Connell

Start Free Trial

Editor's Choice

What is the paradox in "The Most Dangerous Game"?

Quick answer:

The paradox in "The Most Dangerous Game" involves the reversal of roles between hunter and hunted. Initially, Rainsford, a seasoned hunter, becomes the prey when General Zaroff decides to hunt him. This is the first paradox: the hunter becomes the hunted. The second paradox occurs when Rainsford, in an effort to survive, turns the tables and starts hunting Zaroff, thus becoming the hunter again. Ultimately, Rainsford triumphs, completing the role reversal.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is a good question. The big paradox in the short story is that roles are reversed. In fact, there is a double reversal. 

Here is the context. Rainsford (a hunter) and his friend are on a ship headed towards Rio de Janerio.  Rainsford is a famous hunter who has caught a lot of big game. Rainsford accidentally falls into the water and he swims towards the shore and safely arrives. There he meets a man named General Zaroff.

At first all seems well, but Zaroff is twisted, and he wants to hunt Rainsford. This is the first paradox. The hunter is now hunted. In this sense, Rainsford gets a taste of his own medicine. During the process, Rainsford knows that he needs to do something. So, he now goes on the offensive. He begins, therefore, to hunt Zaroff and his servant, Ivan. This is the second paradox. The hunted becomes the hunter, and the hunter unwittingly becomes the hunted. In the end, Rainsford wins.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial