silhouette of a man with one eye open hiding in the jungle

The Most Dangerous Game

by Richard Edward Connell

Start Free Trial

Compare the discussions between Whitney-Rainsford and Rainsford-Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game".

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is a great request. 

In Rainsford 's conversation with his friend, Whitney,  Rainsford says that there are only two classes in the world - the hunted and the huntee.  Rainsford does not entertain the thought that animals have any feelings or thoughts other than the fear of pain and...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

the fear of death.  He leaves it at that.  

In Zaroff's conversation with Rainsford, Zaroff takes Rainsford's idea of two classes and takes it to its logical end.  If there are only two classes in the world, then humans should be included as well.  Some humans should be hunted and some humans should hunt.  Zaroff sees himself in the latter category and so he creates a game on his preserve.  When he tells this to Rainsford, Rainsford is disgusted and wants to leave immediately.  Zaroff obviously does not allow him, because the general wants to hunt him. 

Rainsford does not see the inconsistency of his earlier statement.  Perhaps not all fall into the hunter or huntee. 

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How can I compare the discussion between Whitney and Rainsford to the conversation between Rainsford and Zaroff after dinner?

Both conversations parallel each other and concern the relationship between the hunter and prey. In Rainsford's conversation with Whitney at the beginning of the story, Rainsford states that hunting is the best sport in the world, and Whitney responds by saying, "For the hunter ... Not for the jaguar." Rainsford casually replies that prey do not have any feelings, and Whitney disagrees by saying that animals experience fear and pain. Rainsford responds by saying that the world is made up of two classes, "the hunters and the huntees." He lacks sympathy for the animals he is hunting and believes that he has the inalienable right to exercise his strength by hunting vulnerable creatures.

During Rainsford's initial conversation with General Zaroff, the general admits to hunting humans throughout his island, which shocks and appalls Rainsford. The general lacks sympathy for his prey in the same way Rainsford lacks sympathy for the animals he hunts. Zaroff goes on to say,

Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong.

Zaroff's comment parallels Rainsford's statement regarding the "hunters and huntees." Both men feel that certain people are inherently stronger than others and have the right to exercise their strength on weaker beings. Ironically, Rainsford and General Zaroff have similar views regarding hunting, their prey, and their place in the world. Despite their similar views, Zaroff is a maniacal murderer who does not value human life. As the story progresses, Rainsford develops sympathy for his prey as well as a new perspective on hunting.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How can I compare the discussion between Whitney and Rainsford to the conversation between Rainsford and Zaroff after dinner?

If we compare those two conversations, they have definite similarities.  Both conversations are about hunting.  More specifically, both conversations are about the thrill that the hunter gets from hunting a dangerous animal.  Here is a bit from the Rainsford and Whitney conversation.  

"We should have some good hunting up the Amazon. Great sport, hunting."

"The best sport in the world," agreed Rainsford.

The quote shows that both men are excited to begin hunting the jaguars.  Later, Rainsford's conversation with Zaroff is also about the thrill of hunting a dangerous animal.  

"I'll wager you'll forget your notions when you go hunting with me. You've a genuine new thrill in store for you, Mr. Rainsford."

The conversations are also similar in their division of types of people.  Rainsford tells Whitney that there are two classes in the world.  Rainsford says that there are hunters and huntees.  What's great about Rainsford's comment is that Whitney and readers will likely apply "huntees" to humans in this context.  Whether or not Rainsford means that is questionable, but it does foreshadow his conversation with Zaroff.  Zaroff also believes that the hunter and huntee class distinction exists.  He uses that distinction to help justify why hunting humans is okay.  Zaroff uses slightly different words to identify the class distinction, but the distinction is the same. 

"Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong. Why should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt, why should I not?"

Regarding the topic of hunting, Zaroff and Rainsford have very similar opinions.  That's probably why the two conversations are eerily similar.  The main difference is Rainsford's role in the conversation.  In the first conversation, it is Whitney that expresses compassion toward the feelings of the prey.  In the second conversation, that position is taken by Rainsford. 

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How can I compare the discussion between Whitney and Rainsford to the conversation between Rainsford and Zaroff after dinner?

Unquestionably, there is irony in the responses of Rainsford, both to Whitney and to General Zaroff.  For, unknown to Rainsford, his developing feelings later in the story contradict both of his statements to the Whitney and Zaroff. 

After he himself becomes "an animal at bay," Rainsford understands what he negated in his conversation with Whitney in the exposition of "The Most Dangerous Game."  For, as a hunted "animal at bay" in a tree waiting for the hunter, General Zaroff to discover him, Rainsford comes to know the icy fear of the jaguar, whose feelings he has dismissed earlier in the story.  Then, at the story's end, Rainsford again contradicts a statement of his own made at dinner with Zaroff when he rebuffs the general's remarks about hunting men, declaring that there was no excuse for killing another human being outside of wartime.  Having escaped into the sea, Rainsford appears in Zaroff's bedroom as the general prepares to retire for the night.  They fight a duel with swords and Rainsford, who has decared that hunting another man is reprehensible, slays his foe without remorse:  "He had never slept in a better bed," Rainsford decides.  He has become the hunter of men, a hunter with no sympathy for the hunted.

Last Updated on