Political and Personal Themes
The political nature of Rushdie's work frequently eclipses other important aspects, primarily because of the significant attention his provocative ideas have garnered after the protests and the subsequent issuance of the fatwa. Rushdie himself has remarked that while he regarded Midnight's Children and Shame as "in some ways quite directly political," he believed The Satanic Verses to be "the least political novel I had ever written." He explained that the novel's driving "engine" focused on "not public affairs but other kinds of more personal and political affairs." In a similar vein, when talking about The Moor's Last Sigh, he concurred with an interviewer who proposed that love was the central theme, affirming: "Yes, love. The love of nation, love of parents, love of child, erotic love, romantic love."
Love and Emotional Ties
This concept might appear abstract, but it illuminates Rushdie's handling of the book's central themes: the intricate emotional connections to a homeland; the conflicting emotions arising from a difficult relationship with a diverse family, particularly the challenges of dealing with a dominant, controlling father; and the role of creative imagination—expressed through the richness of language and the revealing power of painting—in providing both understanding and solace as the loss of home leads to ongoing migration. As Rushdie's comments to the interviewer indicate, in his view, love's impact on human affairs is perhaps the most fundamental source of energy in the universe.
Family and Historical Context
The Moor's Last Sigh is written in the tradition of classic nineteenth-century novels, weaving together the fate of a family with the historical evolution of a nation. Rushdie emphasizes this link by including a diagram of the Da Gama/Zogoiby Family Tree before the table of contents. As Coetzee observes, the novel begins with a "dynastic prelude," which sets the stage by outlining the characters, their journeys, sources of wealth, and the overall outlook of Moraes's forebears. The diversity of family history is crucial as it highlights early conflicts in ideas and beliefs.
The narrative starts in Cochin (modern-day Kerala), an important location where the West (Europe) first interacted with the East (the Indian Subcontinent). This area is also pivotal to the spice trade, which contributed to the prosperity of the Da Gama family. Rushdie compares pepper to passion, especially evident in the intense romance between Abraham Zogoiby and Aurora Da Gama, and contrasts the natural origins of love and success with their corruption in commerce and politics, tainted by their estrangement from nature.
Moraes's family faces more than just the rift between an agrarian economy and the modern world's techno-financial complexities. The differences in character, behavior, and ambitions stem from a personal and internal mix of motives that extend beyond societal changes while remaining linked to them. The typical rivalry between families joined by marriage is intensified by the internal struggles confronting the main characters.
Duality and Cultural Fusion
Camoens Da Gama demonstrates an interest in communism and supports Jawaharlal Nehru's vision for an independent India. Despite this, he sets out on a journey to listen to Gandhi speak, noting in his journal, "I had seen India's beauty in that crowd." Moraes also values Nehru's critique of colonialism, adding a humorous touch throughout the novel with a pet dog named Jawaharlal. Indira Gandhi, often portrayed in a negative light (notably for suing Rushdie over her depiction in Midnight's Children ), is cast as the negative contrast to Aurora's positive influence. Nevertheless, Moraes is deeply moved by her assassination. These conflicting emotions highlight a theme of duality or layering, which Aurora explains by saying, "worlds collide, flow in and out of one another." Coetzee views this as the book's central motif, a palimpsest...
(This entire section contains 322 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
that overlays an alternative truth onto a specific image, leading Moraes to perceive himself "neither as Catholic nor as Jew ... a jewholic-anonymous." The novel's historical context is initiated by the fall of Granada in 1492, which Rushdie interprets as "a rupture. One can see Moorish Spain as a fusion of cultures—Spanish, Moorish, Jewish.... In that fusion are ideas which have always appealed to me ... the complex, relativist, hybrid vision of things." Aurora's artworks, as Coetzee describes, aim to layer "tolerant Moorish Spain over India." Rushdie uses these paintings to mirror her (and his own) "prophetic, even Cassandran fear for the nation," as his almost utopian vision of a "plural, hybrid" independent India is often distorted by absolutist fanatics and zealots vying for dominance. The paintings capture certain spiritual qualities ("a sense of community, a sense of hope and comfort, and even a kind of moral structure in people's lives") that Rushdie sees as the positive aspects of religion, frequently expressing Aurora's love and concern for her son while also serving as a means for her ("my nemesis, my foe beyond the grave") to continue impacting his life after her death.
Family Conflict and Identity
The idea of a family—and a nation—torn apart by conflicting desires and beliefs is most vividly illustrated in the relationship between Moraes and his father, Abraham Zogoiby. As Moraes observes, "The reality of a father is a weight few sons can bear." Throughout the narrative, he wrestles with his longing for his father's approval while realizing he must distance himself from his father's influence to forge his own identity. This theme parallels the connection between England and India, reflecting elements of paternalism and rebellion as India responded to imperialist attitudes while adopting aspects of British social and cultural life. The authoritarian presence Moraes faces is captured in his reflections on a low-budget film called Mr. India:
He sits there like a dragon in its lair, a master puppeteer with countless fingers, embodying the core of darkness. He commands weary legions, controls columns of demonic fire with a touch, and orchestrates the hidden music of the underworld.
Blending imagery from Indian folklore with modern adventure films, Moraes compares this hellish Father to some of the most infamous villains of recent times, describing him as "more Blofelder than Blofeld, not just a Godfather but a Gone-farthest, the ultimate dada of dadaism." He deliberately evokes "Luke Skywalker in his final battle with Darth Vader, representing the light and dark sides of the force." However, Moraes typically does not see himself as Luke; instead, he repeatedly suggests that both Zogoibys encompass the entire force within themselves.
Reconciliation and Loss
Rushdie attributes the beginnings of his strained relationship with his father, Anis, to their first trip to England. This journey was for Rushdie to attend the esteemed Rugby public school, accompanied by his father. Instead of the charismatic storyteller he once admired, Rushdie encountered a man who was "drunkenly abusive." In The Satanic Verses, he tells the tale of a son facing a similar situation, whose anger "would boil away his childhood father-worship." Their relationship remained distant until just before his father's passing in 1987. The conclusion of The Satanic Verses includes a reconciliation scene, which Rushdie added partly as "an act of respect." This complex mix of emotions resurfaces in The Moor's Last Sigh, culminating in a profound sense of loss throughout the novel. John Banville captures this loss as one of "parents, country, self, things which to a greater or lesser degree Rushdie himself has lost." As a way to cope with this loss, Moraes gains insight into what he once valued. He reflects, "How easy was my scorn for him, how long it took me to understand his pain." Even when Moraes describes his father as "the most evil man that ever lived," he admits, "my own deeds had taken from me the right to be my father's judge."
Quest for Self-Discovery
Moraes acts as both the narrator of "history" and the main protagonist of the story. His intensely personal journey is essentially a search for self-understanding, symbolizing a rebellion against the disorderly forces that threaten to dismantle the cultural blend Rushdie envisions. Moraes’s storytelling intertwines the past, present, and imaginative possibilities to create a kind of Truth that withstands fragmentation. The difficulty of this endeavor is highlighted by Moraes’s observation that "The truth is always exceptional, freakish, improbable, and almost never normative, almost never what cold calculation would suggest." When achieved, the main narrative of Aurora and Abraham (and their son Moraes), "a story of what happens when love dies" (as Rushdie puts it), also becomes a tale for those who long to:
Cling to the notion of love as the blending of souls, as a fusion, as the triumph of the imperfect, the mixed, combining the best parts of us over what is solitary, isolated, rigid, and pure within us. Imagine love as a form of democracy, as the victory of "no man is an island," where the company of two prevails over the clean, strict, segregating individuals.