Last Updated on June 7, 2022, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 310
Unlike the media recreations of [Lenny] Bruce, Monty Python doesn't care about being loveable. If Monty was, say, a traveler on a train, he would be someone to avoid. Python is as cheerfully mindless, cruel, vulgar and gross as any cross-sampling of midwest auto dealers. They create grotesqueries of monumental...
(The entire section contains 310 words.)
See This Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.
Unlike the media recreations of [Lenny] Bruce, Monty Python doesn't care about being loveable. If Monty was, say, a traveler on a train, he would be someone to avoid. Python is as cheerfully mindless, cruel, vulgar and gross as any cross-sampling of midwest auto dealers. They create grotesqueries of monumental distastefulness (on [Monty Python Matching Tie & Handkerchief], an unlikely British mum skinning and deep-frying a dog while a media-modulated doctor's voice compares the human brain to a fish), but they make you laugh. They turn the most threadbare—and for Americans, obscure—of comic conventions (Australians as hard-drinking blockheads, actors as idiots) into some of their best routines.
The force that makes this kind of inanity work is their vision of a conventional world gone mad—a sophisticate's slapstick landscape, laughed at from a cynic's remove. Priceless routines which first surfaced on their two largely unnoticed … releases, Another Monty Python Record and Monty Python's Previous Record, developed visually in the television shows and recapitulated on T&H, offer an absurdist congruity to their work which enables the audience … to laugh at a world where all food is inedible, all daily activities are as mad as [Lewis] Carroll's exemplary Hatter, and nobody knows when to expect the Spanish Inquisition….
Nearly everybody gets cuffed about on the album, but there's a nasty edge of class snobbery to a good deal of it. If it represents a chance taken …, it must be counted a failure of transcendance…. Snobbery knows no class lines, but the Oxford-Cambridge background of the Pythonians makes any kind of democratic raffishness a little strained. That great leveler, the tube, takes away a lot of potential sting, making it hard to say who the joke's on.
George Arthur, "Another Monty Python Review," in Crawdaddy (copyright © 1975 by Crawdaddy Publishing Co., Inc.; all rights reserved; reprinted by permission), December, 1975. p. 70.