Places Discussed
Islaev estate
Islaev estate (ees-LA-ev). Country estate of a rich landowner, Arkady Islaev, located in an unspecified part of Russia. Ivan Turgenev uses a tranquil country setting because he is familiar with it, despite his frequent world travels, and also because he wants to contrast it with the emotional turmoil within practically all the characters. Although the play is subtitled a comedy, it depicts serious conflicts of several love relationships, mostly unrequited, that belie the quiet and beautiful settings of nature. Drawing rooms, a card table, the ballroom, the gardens, a shady pavilion—all point to a leisurely life in the country.
It is ironic that, when love’s passions reach a boiling point, “like a sudden storm on a fine day,” several characters leave for Moscow, as if fleeing from rustic country life. This seems to confirm the critic Georg Brandes’s seeing nature in Turgenev’s works as la grande indifférente. After several characters leave the estate, the quiet life returns. Those that remain, especially Islaev’s wife Natalia Petrovna, who had caused most of the turmoil with her infatuation with the young student Belaev, her jealousy and her desire to break the monotony of her life, are forced to find a rapport with nature again. With its lyrical mood and scarcity of action, A Month in the Country is a forerunner of Anton Chekhov’s plays.
Historical Context
The Political Landscape of Turgenev's Era
The flickering hope for reform and the simmering tensions of revolution set the political stage for much of Turgenev's literary creations. Between the 1820s and the 1880s, Russia wrestled with defining its identity on the global stage. The reign of Nicholas I, which stretched from 1825 to 1855, was marked by his vision of Russia as a self-reliant nation, untethered from Western European influences. His reign was a canvas painted with the colors of nationalism, underpinned by a centralized government. To cement his power, Nicholas I swelled the ranks of the secret service and tightened the grip of censorship.
Dichotomy of Thought: Slavophiles vs. Westerners
During Nicholas I’s era, Russian society found itself cleaved into two distinct schools of thought. This division flourished not only in academic circles but also spilled over into the mainstream. The two predominant factions were the Philosophical Idealists, known as the Slavophiles, and their counterparts, the Westerners. As Herbert J. Ellison highlights in History of Russia, the Philosophical Idealists of the 1830s envisioned Russia as a burgeoning civilization poised for maturity and leadership alongside a declining Europe. Although they embraced a nationalistic approach, they stood firmly against the actual tyranny of the imperial regime, as Sidney Harcave discusses in Russia: A History.
Conversely, the Westerners of the 1840s and 1850s, according to Ellison, advocated for Russia to follow a Western path of development. They were less inclined toward nationalism and found value in emulating Western progress. This group criticized the censorship and the stark economic and social divides between the serfs and the nobility, believing that Russia lagged behind the West's achievements.
Artistic Echoes of a Politically Charged Era
Inevitably, the artists of this tumultuous era absorbed the political climate around them. Though censorship cast a shadow over many writers, Russia's cultural output during Nicholas I's reign remained vibrant. Ellison notes that "the reign of Nicholas I was in many ways a period of extraordinary growth and of great attainments . . . particularly in literature." However, it beckons the question of how much richer the cultural landscape might have been had censorship not been so severe. Before the 1840s, poetry reigned supreme in Russia's literary world,...
(This entire section contains 581 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
but with the emergence of realism, prose fiction began to command attention. Known as naturalism in Russia, realism brought "everyday people who had hitherto been admitted neither to the homes nor to the writings of the fashionable" into the literary limelight. Nikolai Gogol, author ofThe Inspector General, stands as a towering figure in this movement.
The Dawn of Reform under Alexander II
By the mid-1850s, the fervor for reform was palpable, and with the ascent of Alexander II to the throne, a tide of transformation swept through the nation. As Ellison remarked, Nicholas I's reign faltered in "stemming the tide of intellectual radicalism... to buttress the traditional social order... [and] to achieve a more enlightened and efficient government." Alexander II embraced this challenge and set about dismantling the old order, easing censorship, and overhauling the bureaucratic framework, including the government administration, judiciary, education system, military, and economic policies.
However, success is not solely judged by intent. As Ellison observed, Alexander II's shortcomings were in the speed and breadth of change, not its direction. Harcave concluded that "Although Alexander II, like Peter [the Great], failed to attain all the goals that he set for himself, his reforms helped to bring about such changes that his reign may be considered the second great watershed in Russian history."
Literary Style
Setting
A Month in the Country unfolds against the backdrop of 19th-century Russia on a lavish estate owned by an affluent landowner. The entire drama spans just a week, with most of its unfolding drama contained within the confines of the Islayev's elegant drawing room. By choosing the 1840s as the temporal setting, Turgenev infuses a layer of political nuance into the narrative. During Tsar Nicholas I's rule, an intensified network of secret police and heightened censorship stifled the voices of Russian citizens, curtailing their expression. As Natalya endeavors to liberate herself from the shackles of patriarchal constraints and matrimonial bonds, A Month in the Country emerges as a symbolic critique of the Russian populace's yearning to exercise their autonomy and pursue their innermost passions. Much like Natalya's desire to act without restraint, the people of Russia, particularly its artists, sought the freedom to chart their own courses.
Realism
Realism, both a narrative technique and a literary movement, flourished during Turgenev's era. A Month in the Country epitomizes this style by portraying characters and scenarios that resonate with the authenticity of daily existence. The characters and plot possess a tangible realism, eschewing the fantastical flights of imagination for a depiction of life as it truly is.
Biographical Elements
Though A Month in the Country is not a direct autobiography, it weaves threads of Turgenev's life into its fabric. His enduring affection for Pauline Viardot finds a parallel in Rakitin's steadfast loyalty to Natalya. Throughout his life, Turgenev orchestrated his movements to remain close to Pauline and her husband, reflecting the friendship between Rakitin and Islayev. Moreover, Turgenev's essence is captured not only in Rakitin but also in Natalya, mirroring the author's artistic struggle against censorship and his fervent thirst for freedom. Just as Natalya is haunted by her tyrannical father, Turgenev grappled with his fearsome mother, whose capricious cruelty left an indelible mark on him.
Foreshadowing
Foreshadowing, a literary device that hints at future developments, is deftly employed by Turgenev in the play's opening act, where Anna, Schaaf, and Liza engage in a game of hearts. This card game is laden with symbolism, suggesting from the outset that, akin to the fortunes of the game, the dynamics of love will reveal both victors and vanquished by the play's conclusion.
Another layer of foreshadowing envelops Rakitin and Beliayev. Rakitin's choice to depart the estate hints that, driven by honor, Beliayev might similarly choose to leave, echoing Rakitin's resolve.
Symbolism
The intricate game of hearts, played by Anna, Schaaf, and Liza, stands as a poignant symbol within Turgenev's narrative. While seemingly a mere pastime, the game's title carries profound weight. Positioned strategically at the play's commencement, the game underscores the thematic focus on matters of the heart. In both the realm of cards and love, few emerge triumphant; the possibility of loss looms large. As the play unfolds, many find themselves heartbroken, mirroring Schaaf's disheartened defeat and the unfulfilled dreams of others in their pursuit of love.
Irony
Irony, where outcomes starkly contrast with expectations, plays a pivotal role in A Month in the Country. Despite love being a central theme, enduring romantic connections remain elusive for the characters. Love, ideally an uplifting and passionate journey, brings none of the characters true happiness. The narrative suggests little hope for contentment in their romantic endeavors. Vera consents to marry Bolshintsov to escape the estate, Natalya lingers with Islayev while longing for another, and Anna aligns with Shpigelski, devoid of love for him.
Compare and Contrast
Mid-1800s: Under the stern gaze of Nicholas I, the corridors of education felt the weight of innumerable constraints. Western philosophies and literature found themselves exiled from classrooms, replaced by a curriculum heavily dictated by governing authorities. Yet, when Alexander II ascended the throne, winds of change began to stir. He pursued educational reform with vigor, easing censorship and granting universities greater independence.
Today: The dissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s sparked a renaissance in education, birthing a multitude of private schools and burgeoning institutions of higher learning. The educational tapestry expanded, weaving in previously forbidden works and new interpretations of Russian and Soviet histories.
Mid-1800s: The lush expanses of land were the domain of the affluent, tilled by the labor of serfs bound to their soil. Under Nicholas I, whispers of change echoed as the movement to liberate the serfs gained momentum. However, true liberation did not dawn until February 19, 1861. The reform promised land to the serfs in a three-phase transition from noble hands to their own. Despite the high costs and meager plots, these reforms elevated the societal standing of the lowest tier in Russia.
Today: Since the Soviet Union's collapse, the journey towards privatizing agriculture has been sluggish. Even by the mid-1990s, a significant swath of farmland lingered under the control of erstwhile collective and state-run farms. These entities morphed into cooperatives or joint-stock companies, yet land ownership remained predominantly centralized.
Mid-1800s: The 1860s and 1870s heralded Russia’s grand industrial blossoming, yet its roots were sown earlier. The completion of vast road networks and the Moscow-Petersburg railway catalyzed industrial growth alongside burgeoning urban centers and cottage industries. Under Alexander II’s leadership, wasteful tax practices were eradicated, railways continued their sprawling march across the landscape, and financial institutions flourished, setting the stage for Russia’s expansive industrial and commercial surge.
Today: As the curtain falls on the twentieth century, Russia stands at the forefront of a new epoch—the technological revolution. The burgeoning computer industry reshapes the global arena, and Russia, like many nations, eagerly embraces the boundless opportunities wrought by this new era of communication.
Mid-1800s: The Russian Empire, under the iron grip of autocrats, danced to the whims of rulers whose personal inclinations defined governmental objectives.
Today: In the last twenty years, Russia has navigated the tumultuous waters of shifting from a monolithic, single-party communist regime to a vibrant, multiparty democracy. The once omnipotent Communist Party has fragmented into a tapestry of political entities, spanning the spectrum from monarchists to communists. Broadly, these parties align into three ideological factions: nationalist/communist, pro-market/democratic, and centrist/special interest.
Media Adaptations
A Cinematic Experience
A Month in the Country found its way onto the silver screen as part of Mastervision's arts series dedicated to drama. Crafted during the vibrant 1980s, this ninety-minute cinematic adaptation boasts performances by the illustrious Susannah York alongside the charismatic Ian McShane. The screenplay was the brainchild of Derek Marlowe, with the visionary direction of Quentin Lawrence, and produced under the adept guidance of Peter Snell.
A Soviet Interpretation
In the year 1969, the U.S.S.R.'s Melodiia unveiled a unique auditory experience titled Stseny iz spektaklei, translating to Scenes from Plays. This recording featured excerpts from A Month in the Country and was presented in the rich and emotive Russian language.
An Operatic Transformation
The year 1981 witnessed A Month in the Country being reincarnated as an opera, capturing audiences at both the Boston and New England Conservatories. John Moriarty wielded the conductor's baton, orchestrating the musical spectacle, while David Bartholomew brought the production to life with his directorial prowess.
An Australian Broadcast
In the same year, 1981, a captivating 100-minute auditory edition of the play was released by A.B.C. in Sydney, Australia, offering a rich soundscape to its listeners.
Bibliography and Further Reading
SOURCES
Harcave, Sidney. Russia: A History, J. B. Lippincott, 1968, pp. 248-74.
Schechner, Richard. Introduction to A Month in the Country, translated by Richard Newnham, Chandler, 1962, pp. vii-xviii.
FURTHER READING
Ellison, Herbert J. History of Russia, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,
1964, pp. 134-218.
This book chronicles Russia's history. The particular pages noted cover the
years 1801 through 1881, roughly encompassing the period of Turgenev's
life.
Freeborn, Richard. Turgenev: The Novelist's Novelist: A Study, Oxford
University Press, 1960, pp. xi-36.
While this book focuses upon Turgenev as a novelist, its beginning chapters
provide an introduction to his guiding philosophies, political leanings, and
development as a writer.
Garnett, Edward. Turgenev, Kennikat Press, 1966, pp. v-34.
This work presents a discussion of Turgenev's childhood, family life, and his
early works as well as a chapter about his critics.
Knowles, A. V. Ivan Turgenev, edited by Charles A. Moser, Twayne,
1988.
This book offers an in-depth look at Turgenev with chapters devoted to his
biography, literary career, reputation, six of his novels, and his final years.
A Month in the Country is also discussed.
Schapiro, Leonard. Turgenev: His Life and Times, Oxford University
Press, 1978.
This book contextualizes Turgenev's life and works within the nineteenth
century.
Yarmolinsky, Avraham. Turgenev: The Man—His Art—His Age, Hodder &
Stroughton, 1926.
Yarmolinsky's work offers a survey of Turgenev's life and his literary
accomplishments.
Bibliography
Fitzlyon, April. A Month in the Country: An Exhibition Presented by the Theatre Museum. London: Victoria and Albert Museum, 1983. A useful illustrated presentation of Turgenev’s work for theater, with a bibliography of translations of his plays into English and of their productions in Great Britain. Various aspects of A Month in the Country are treated in an uncluttered way.
Freeborn, Richard. “Turgenev the Dramatist.” In Critical Essays on Ivan Turgenev, edited by David A. Lowe. Boston: G. K. Hall, 1989. An excellent survey of Turgenev’s dramatic works. Freeborn considers Turgenev’s work for the theater a part of his apprenticeship for future works. In A Month in the Country, he added a dimension of forceful psychological insight, reinforced by a sharp edge of social criticism.
Magarshack, David. Turgenev: A Life. London: Faber and Faber, 1954. An illustrated biography by Turgenev’s translator, concentrating on the events shaping his life, his relationships with Russian and foreign writers, and the circumstances surrounding his works, including A Month in the Country.
Seeley, Frank Friedeberg. “Poetry, Plays, Criticism.” In Turgenev: A Reading of His Fiction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991. In this survey of Turgenev’s poetry and plays, Seeley finds A Month in the Country to be a combination of two subtle psychological portraits, that of a woman in crisis and of a Hamlet-type hero. The play marks the full development of the Russian psychological drama a generation before Chekhov.