Monster Summary

Monster by Walter Dean Myers is a 1999 novel about Steve Harmon, a sixteen-year-old boy on trial for his alleged complicity in a robbery-turned-murder.

  • Steve is accused of participating in a deadly drugstore robbery. While in prison awaiting trial, he decides to document his experience as a screenplay.

  • The trial is heated, but the evidence indicates that Steve was at worst a nonviolent lookout and at best entirely uninvolved and innocent.

  • Though Steve is cleared of all charges, his lawyer seems to doubt his innocence, leading him to question the prosecution's characterization of him as a "monster."

Summary

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Monster follows the trial of sixteen-year-old Steve Harmon from Monday, July 6th, to Tuesday, July 14th, with the final chapter covering the verdict on Friday, July 17th. There is a short prologue in which Steve reflects on life in prison, which feels unreal to him. It seems like a film, but without the plot or any other such structure. He decides to write a screenplay based on his prison experience and gives it the title Monster, which is what the prosecutor called him during his trial. The rest of the novel takes the form of this screenplay.

On Monday, Steve describes his journey to the courthouse from the Manhattan Detention Center. He employs the language of cinema, noting the camera angles, cuts, and other technical details of the scene. At the courthouse, Steve’s lawyer, Kathy O’Brien, explains that the prosecutor, Sandra Petrocelli, is seeking the death penalty against him for murder, claiming that he acted as a lookout during a drugstore robbery in which Mr. Nesbitt, the owner of the store, was shot. Although the robbery and the shooting were actually carried out by two older men, James King and Bobo Evans, Steve will also be legally culpable of murder if found guilty. Evidence is adduced that connects King and Evans to the murder, though the witness is a criminal who has been promised a reduced sentence for testifying. Steve listens to some of it while his mind occasionally flashes back to his childhood, which was full of violence despite his own attempts to avoid trouble.

On Tuesday, there is another witness who gives similar testimony to the first, and for the same reason: he is a career criminal who has been promised a reduced sentence if he testifies. Asa Briggs, the lawyer representing James King, points to this incentive and questions the objectivity and truthfulness of his account. In the detention center, both before and after the trial, Steve hears the sounds of fighting, and at night he hears a gang-rape taking place.

On Wednesday morning, Steve begins the day thinking about how even shoelaces and belts are taken away from prison inmates, since suicide is a common—and understandable—occurrence in these circumstances. In court, the testimony comes from the investigating officer, Detective Karyl. Steve’s mind drifts back to the night Karyl questioned him. The detective immediately assumed Steve was guilty because he was a young Black man, and Kathy O’Brien is concerned that the jury will share this prejudice and believe the detective, despite the fact that his investigation has been slipshod. Osvaldo Cruz, who has also been accused of taking part in the robbery, testifies that he did so only when threatened by Bobo Evans.

On Thursday, the questioning of Cruz continues. Although he has been charged with keeping a lookout for the robbers, the same crime as Steve, he has subsequently been acquitted in exchange for his testimony, partly because of his youth (he is fourteen). However, Cruz is also a dangerous gang member with a history of violence and intimidation, which undercuts his claim to have been coerced. During this day, Steve becomes increasingly concerned that others see him as a monster, including his lawyer, the jury, and even his father, who comes to visit him.

On Friday, four witnesses take the stand, including the medical examiner, who testifies that the bullet which killed Mr. Nesbitt caused extensive internal bleeding, meaning that he died by drowning in his own blood. Steve is horrified by this, but it does not seem to affect the rest of the court much. James King, in particular, appears bored and indifferent.

On Saturday, the court is in recess and Steve is in the detention center all day. He thinks of what O’Brien has told him about the likelihood of his spending decades in prison and wonders whether he would be able to endure this, especially given what he has heard of the rape and physical injury that are common in prison life. He ruminates on the deep unfairness of his having to go through this ordeal because he happened to be in the neighborhood of the drugstore where Mr. Nesbitt was killed. His mother visits him in prison and gives him a Bible, but she is unable to comfort him. She says she knows he is innocent, but Steve is unsure whether to believe her.

On Sunday morning, Steve goes to the prison church service, but a fight breaks out and the inmates are all put on lockdown. After it ends, Steve’s parents visit. Their attempts to cheer him up are futile, and he thinks that they are already preparing for the worst and mourning him as if he were dead.

On Monday, Petrocelli questions a witness who says that she saw James King arguing with Mr. Nesbitt in the drugstore, but King’s lawyer casts doubt on her identification, and she has to admit to some uncertainty. Bobo Evans, who, like several other witnesses, has made a plea bargain, testifies next. He says that King pointed out Steve as their lookout and that, after Steve left the drugstore, he and King began fighting with Mr. Nesbitt. When Nesbitt pulled a gun, King managed to take it from him and shoot him with it, after which they both fled with money and cigarettes. In O’Brien’s cross-examination, Evans admits that he did not speak to Steve himself and only has King’s word for his involvement.

On Tuesday, Steve himself takes the stand. Having realized that the impression he makes is more important than telling the truth (which so many other witnesses have not done), he says that he did not go into the drugstore on the day in question. Mr. Sawicki, the film teacher from Steve’s school, appears as a character witness, testifying that Steve is a decent person whose main interest is in filmmaking. The case concludes, and Steve returns to the detention center to await the verdict.

The previous chapters have all taken place on consecutive days, but the final chapter occurs on Friday, July 17th, when Steve returns to court for the verdict. The jury finds James King guilty, and he is placed in handcuffs and led from the courtroom. They find Steve not guilty. He attempts to hug Kathy O’Brien, but she turns away, leaving Steve with arms outstretched. The final cinematic image is of Steve silhouetted in this posture, looking like “one of the pictures they use for psychological testing, or some strange beast, a monster.”

The screenplay ends here. A postscript written five months later reveals that Steve is still making films, though he is distant from his parents and wonders obsessively what caused O'Brien to turn away from him.

Expert Q&A

Is the book Monster based on a true story?

No, Monster is not based on one specific true story. However, one could say that Monster reflects the general realities of America’s prejudiced and biased justice system. Steve’s case might be connected to true cases of Black teens who were accused of crimes that they didn’t commit. Additionally, some of Steve’s traits and troubles could be connected to those of Walter Dean Myers himself.

What are the key plot elements in Monster by Walter Dean Myers?

The key plot elements in Monster include the exposition, where Steve is introduced and his trial for murder is explained. The rising action encompasses the trial, affecting Steve psychologically. The climax is the jury's not guilty verdict. The falling action involves Steve's emotional rebuff by his lawyer. The resolution shows Steve's post-trial isolation and sadness.

In Monster by Walter Dean Myers, what is the climax and how does it change the novel's outcome?

The climax of Walter Dean Myers' Monster is the jury's verdict, which finds Steve not guilty. This pivotal moment shifts the novel's outcome by challenging the reader's perception of Steve's innocence. While his acquittal brings relief, it also raises lingering questions about his involvement in the crime. The lawyer's cold reaction and the metaphorical "monster" imagery highlight the ambiguity and critique the legal system's failure to uncover absolute truth.

What is the resolution of Monster?

The resolution of Monster is not really much of a resolution at all. Although Steve has been acquitted and is now a free man, he still cannot achieve inner peace, not least because his own father doesn't feel like he knows him anymore.

What is the climax of the story Monster?

One possible climax in Monster is when the verdict is read. However, another possible climax is when the closing arguments are presented.

Show another question (2 questions hidden)

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Next

Chapter Summaries

Loading...