The Miracle of the Birds Analysis
by Jorge Amado

Start Your Free Trial

Style and Technique

(Comprehensive Guide to Short Stories, Critical Edition)

Download The Miracle of the Birds Study Guide

Subscribe Now

Critics characterize Amado as an instinctive writer. His comparative lack of reflectiveness and defects of craftsmanship are compensated by his ability to captivate the reader with his storytelling skills. If his work is marked by a certain glibness, there is also an undeniable vividness to the scenes in his stories and novels, and “The Miracle of the Birds” is no exception.

Amado characteristically uses the device of authorial narrative in his fiction, that is, of a storyteller reporting and commenting on events. Widely used for centuries, this framing device is evident in Henry Fielding’s Tom Jones (1749) as well as Miguel de Cervantes’s El ingenioso hidalgo don Quixote de la Mancha (1605, 1615; The History of the Valorous and Wittie Knight-Errant, Don Quixote of the Mancha, 1612-1620; better known as Don Quixote de la Mancha). Producing the sense of immediacy and “presentness” made possible by a first-person narrative, the technique also permits the writer to exploit such privileges of third-person narration as intrusion and commentary, thereby directing the reader’s interpretation of events. The device aims, ultimately, at convincing the reader of the “reality,” or authenticity, of the story being told.

The authorial narrative relies largely on simulating the spoken word, enabling Amado’s fiction to bridge the worlds of folklore and myth. The “realism ” of Amado’s style, then, seeks to approximate that of popular literature. Indeed, his narrative pose is that of a chronicler of “the people,” rooted in the oral tradition of popular folklore and song. In keeping with this tradition, sustaining action is his forte. His characters, following E. M. Forster’s categorization, are more apt to be “flat” than “round”; that is, they are readily identifiable and should...

(The entire section is 442 words.)