The Mind Is an Enchanting Thing Summary
by Marianne Moore

Start Your Free Trial

Download The Mind Is an Enchanting Thing Study Guide

Subscribe Now

The Mind Is an Enchanting Thing Summary

(Masterpieces of American Literature)

“The Mind Is an Enchanting Thing” appeared in the 1944 publication of Nevertheless. Both technically and thematically it is a central poem in Moore’s work. In it, she uses intricate syllabic verse and stanzaic arrangements. Through a series of similes and metaphors, she alternates between details and generalities, integrating the two in the last line. The poems deals with a complex paradox: The mind is both subject and object, both enchanter and enchanted. It has the power to dissolve unities into multiplicities and also to synthesize those different facets into new unities. It has the power to transform dejection into joy, death into life. Moore is celebrating the miracle of the poetic process.

She introduces the paradox at the poem’s beginning by changing a single syllable; the “enchanting” of the title becomes “enchanted” in the first line. A series of similes follows, each focusing on the contradiction inherent in being both subject and object. Having established the paradox, Moore uses an animal, the kiwi, to lead to the central part of the poem, the concept of the mind that “walks along with its eyes on the ground.” Kiwi is the name New Zealand natives give to the apteryx, a flightless bird with a long beak that walks looking downward. It, too, is a paradox. It is a bird, but it does not fly. The mind is like the kiwi—it focuses intently, but it also “has memory’s ear.” It is in touch with the history it has stored, and in that sense, it can fly anywhere.

The sequence of similes that follows describes strange phenomena that bring this contradiction to life: “Like the gyroscope’s fall,” and “like the dove-/ neck animated by/ sun.” Forces of the universe move the gyroscope. Like the mind, it possesses those memories. The last line of the fourth stanza sums up these images: “It’s conscientious inconsistency.” Things are fixed and not fixed at the same time, just like the mind.

The concluding lines deal with the outcome of being a “conscientious inconsistency.” The mind “tears off the veil” that the heart wears. Like the veil that separated the holy from the truly elect in the temple at Jerusalem, the veil the heart wears gets in the way of understanding. The veil represents certainty and, for Moore, the opposite of insight, so this process of liberating the heart to pursue truth is as important as the truth itself. The mind is also flexible. It resembles “unconfusion [that] submits/ its confusion to proof.” Unlike King Herod, who...

(The entire section is 632 words.)