What poetic elements are found in Margaret Atwood's "You Fit Into Me"?

Atwood uses several poetic devices in her concise poem “You Fit Into Me” to portray the two sides of a relationship. Although it is only four lines long, the poem is an example of extended metaphor, simile, and apostrophe.

Atwood uses apostrophe as the speaker directly addresses her love. She states that the person fits her “like a hook into an eye,” a simile that states how much she believes they belong together. Although the speaker mentions a fish hook, we must understand that Atwood is playing on the word “hook.” This extended metaphor actually means the type of hook and eye that is used on clothing. Therefore, the speaker is saying that the pair of lovers are perfect together; each complements and works with the other.

However, we must consider why the speaker follows up this metaphor with another metaphor: “a fish hook/ an open eye.” Perhaps this means that although the couple work well together, there are sometimes bad points. Obviously, a fish hook in an open eye would not be a good thing. Thus, while the first stanza represents the good side of their relationship, the second stanza symbolizes the difficulties, or possibly even a brutal side, of the relationship.

How does Margaret Atwood convey a feminist message in her short poem "You Fit Into Me"?

Although the poem is certainly open to interpretation, what Atwood is doing is drawing contrasting images between what is expected and what is reality. This occurs both through the language of the poem itself as well as through the deeper message it conveys.

The poem starts off very wholesomely. “You fit into me, like a hook into an eye” implies the existence of a relationship, one that is as much of an exact, perfect match as is the eye of a lock, into which only one particular kind of key fits. However, in the very next lines, this imagery is reversed. The reader realizes that Atwood is not talking about a key, and the eye is not they eyehole of a lock. It is a fishhook in a human eye. The language at the end highlights how terrible of a combination this relationship actually has, and that it would be better if these two things never came together. This is true both of fishhook and eyeballs as well as a man and woman in an unfavorable relationship.

However, the size of the poem also conveys a sense of irony. Upon reading the second set of lines, the reader immediately recognizes the humor of the poem, as well as the incommensurability of the two objects in question (which represent a bad relationship). This recognition is almost instantaneous—of course nobody would want to have a fishhook in their eye! But, and this is Atwood’s deeper point, many bad relationships can last for months and even years before the two partners realize that there is a problem. As obvious and unhealthy as some relationships are, couples may remain blind to their own disfunction, and thus fail to appreciate their own incommensurability. Thus, the brevity with which the reader recognizes a problem in Atwood’s poem is contrasted with the incredibly long periods of time it takes men and women to recognize problems in their love life.