Places Discussed
*Shanghai
*Shanghai. Port city at the mouth of the Yangtze River that was—and still is—the most populous city of China, housing an estimated three million people in 1927, thirty-five thousand of them foreigners. Shanghai then was also uniquely international, made so by European imperialism. Europeans in China enjoyed extraterritorial rights and were beyond the jurisdiction of Chinese law. Hence, although Shanghai was a Chinese city, it was actually divided into three administrative and juridical sectors: the Chinese sector, the British sector (known as the “international settlement”), and the French sector (or “concession”). In each sector, Chinese inhabitants were in the majority. Shanghai in 1927 was a divided city somewhat like Berlin, Germany, following World War II.
Although Malraux had lived in Asia, it is doubtful that he knew Shanghai firsthand in 1927; his descriptions therefore resemble a newsreel. More important, because of Shanghai’s international nature, Malraux could assemble a multinational cast for his epic—French, Germans, Russians, Chinese, and mixed-race characters. Malraux’s Shanghai can thus be seen as a political microcosm of his contemporary world during an existentialist moment of history when the communist revolution was challenging capitalist imperialism as a global ideology.
Hotel room
Hotel room. Setting of the opening scene, in which Ch’en, a Chinese communist leader, assassinates an arms dealer. Malraux transforms this room into a metaphoric place with metaphysical significance. Beginning here, Malraux divides his novel’s places (also characters, actions, ideas) into two dialectical opposites: the absolute versus the relative, the essentialist versus the existentialist, the static versus the evolving. Through Ch’en’s narrative point of view, this dark room becomes an absolutist place where he will bring death (the absolute, essentialist, and static experience) into being. Outside the room, it is brightly lit Shanghai by night, a relativist place with human beings in relationships—existential, changing.
Black Cat nightclub
Black Cat nightclub. Baron de Clappique’s favorite hangout. It is another absolutist and essentialist site because its patrons escape relatedness and existential responsibility through liquor and sensuality. There also, Clappique indulges in mythomania, escaping into an absolutist fantasy world by spinning tall tales about himself.
Gisors’ house
Gisors’ house. Located in Shanghai’s French section, this is home to Gisors, a French Marxist sociology professor; his part-Japanese son Kyo, a Chinese Communist Party leader; and Kyo’s wife May, a German communist doctor. There, Kyo experiences an absolute of isolation as he realizes that his relationship with May is not founded on reality and that his identity is split between his inner sense of himself (essentialist, absolute) and others’ sense of him (existentialist, relative). There also, Ch’en visits Gisors, his professor, after the assassination, hoping to communicate and exorcise his angst; instead, Gisors becomes aware of the essential isolation of each individual and retreats into an absolutist world by smoking opium.
*Hankow (Hangzhou)
*Hankow (Hangzhou). City near Shanghai. Malraux identifies it as the Chinese Communist Party’s stronghold, where the Russian advisers are headquartered. He also makes Hankow a metaphor for ideological essentialism and absolutism. Kyo and Ch’en go there to seek advice on what to do when General Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang Party (supported by capitalists and Western imperialists) begins persecuting communists. The Russians fall back on Lenin’s writings, trusting them like absolute and essentialist (fundamentalist) scripture and refusing the Chinese Communists permission to evolve their own revolution.
Prison yard
Prison yard. Schoolyard that has been converted into a prison for communists sentenced to death. Although death is the ultimate absolute and the essentialist isolation of an individual, Kyo transforms his death into an existential act by committing suicide with his cyanide pill. His Russian comrade Katov is even more heroic. He...
(This entire section contains 687 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
gives his own cyanide to two other terrified condemned men, then he accepts immolation alive in a furnace. In Malraux’s metaphoric use of the schoolyard, the nationalists (capitalists and imperialists) are in this former schoolyard to teach a lesson about the absolute certainty of futility for humans in death, while the communists are there to teach a lesson about the relative possibilities of meaningfulness and utility to humans, even in death.
Literary Techniques
Malraux's concise and vigorous style is interspersed with newspaper headlines and radio broadcasts, enhancing the story's dramatic effect and creating the illusion of reality. He often pairs a sequence of brief, energetic scenes, reminiscent of the flashback and flash-forward techniques used in film. Detailed depictions of events are followed by gradual fade-outs, then succeeded by more close-ups, followed by additional fade-outs and close-ups. This continual shift in focus serves to subordinate external events to the internal conflict. The emphasis transitions from historical to metaphysical, leading the reader to understand that the intense sociopolitical struggle Malraux describes is merely a reflection of the protagonist's inner conflict, who symbolizes Modern Man.
Literary Precedents
Initially, Malraux was perceived as a "committed" author because his novels delve into significant sociopolitical events that have greatly shaped the Modern Era. It was believed that his intent was to promote global social revolution. However, a closer examination of his work reveals that Malraux is not aligned with the conventional "engage" writers, who aim to convey a specific ideological stance in their works. Instead, he is more akin to "dominated" writers like Dostoevsky and Faulkner, who use writing as a means to address their own existential issues through literary expression. Nietzsche and Freud significantly influenced Malraux's literary vision. Nietzsche is noted for his declaration of "the death of God" and his advocacy for the emergence of the New Man, while Freud contributed through his exploration of the subconscious, aspiring to foster self-determined, rational individuals.
Oswald Spengler was another key influence on Malraux. What Spengler articulated in The Decline of the West (1926-1928), Malraux vividly brings to life in his novels. Malraux's brilliance lies in his ability to transform the deep philosophical, psychological, and historical concepts of thinkers like Nietzsche, Freud, and Spengler into compelling drama. Through his artistic use of symbolic scenarios and characters that represent the twentieth century's "Every Man," Malraux invites readers to reflect on and analyze some of the major moral and metaphysical challenges humanity faces today.