Critical Overview

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

George Bernard Shaw's works are renowned for their cleverness and depth, with the subtitles of his plays often providing as much insight as the plays themselves. Among these, Man and Superman, subtitled A Comedy and a Philosophy, stands out as one of his most philosophically rich plays. This play delves into themes of gender dynamics and the conflict between instinct and intellect, encapsulating Shaw’s views on societal conventions.

Philosophical Depth and Narrative

Man and Superman is a vehicle for Shaw’s belief that drama serves primarily as a platform for engaging the public with philosophical discourse. It presents a unique take on the Don Juan legend, with the protagonist, John Tanner, representing a modern reincarnation of Don Juan Tenorio. Unlike the traditional libertine, Tanner is a man driven by moral passion and intellect, challenging societal norms with his Nietzschean Superman ideals. This play explores the inevitable triumph of instinct over intellect in the gender wars, where woman, personified by Ann, emerges victorious over even the most intellectually superior men.

Shaw uses Tanner's journey to illustrate a philosophical battle that involves a surrender to societal norms—marriage. Despite Tanner’s attempts to live a life governed by reason, he succumbs to the sexual and maternal instincts embodied by Ann, thus committing what Shaw describes as "moral suicide." This narrative unfolds both through a comedic and seemingly trivial plot and through more profound philosophical discourse.

The "Don Juan in Hell" Interlude

One of the play’s most significant sections is the "Don Juan in Hell" dream sequence, a play-within-a-play where Shaw's characters take on mythical and historical personas to engage in a philosophical dialogue. Here, Tanner as Don Juan debates with representations of moral forces: Ann as Doña Ana de Ulloa, Ramsden as Don Gonzalo, and Mendoza as the Devil. Through these interactions, Shaw reiterates his central theme: that the ultimate purpose of Man is the pursuit of intellect, yet this pursuit is constantly undermined by Woman’s instinctual drive to domesticate and propagate. The implications are clear—Man, no matter how intellectually superior, is destined to abandon his purposes in favor of Woman’s goals.

Comic Elements and Characterization

Despite its philosophical weight, Man and Superman remains light-hearted and entertaining, largely due to Shaw's skillful character development. Tanner, though a paragon of morality, is humorously depicted as fallible and absurdly eloquent, often becoming the target of Ann's sharp wit. Ann herself, while manipulative and deceptive, captivates audiences with her charm and cunning.

The supporting characters, while serving the thematic framework, are crafted to add levity to the narrative. Characters such as Ramsden and Mrs. Whitefield represent the old order's authority yet are portrayed with comedic flair. Octavius, the lovesick youth, provides comic relief as Tanner's foil, while Mendoza, the charismatic bandit, and Straker, the cheeky chauffeur, enhance the play’s humor. Malone, the senile millionaire, further enriches this ensemble, contributing to the play's enduring appeal.

Critical Reception and Legacy

Upon its publication in 1903, Man and Superman initially garnered mixed reviews. G. K. Chesterton found the book "fascinating and delightful," though he critiqued Shaw for his bleak view of humanity. Max Beerbohm and other critics echoed similar sentiments, noting a lack of depth in Shaw’s characters. Despite this, the play's 1905 staging was a significant success, marking a pivotal point in Shaw’s career as Granville Barker's production helped spotlight Shaw's theatrical prowess.

However, Shaw's portrayal of gender dynamics drew criticism for its perceived lack of realism, notably from William Archer, who labeled Ann a "man-devouring monster." Critics like E. A. Baughan and A. B. Walkley argued that Shaw's "idea-plot" overwhelmed the "action plot," leading to a play...

(This entire section contains 795 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

that felt more like an ideological discourse than a dramatic narrative. Nonetheless, the play enjoyed a long run, proving its popularity and power to engage audiences despite—or perhaps because of—its contentious themes.

Shaw's Enduring Influence

Throughout his career, Shaw was often criticized for the verbosity and intellectualism in his plays, which some felt overshadowed their theatrical elements. Critics like V. S. Pritchett described his works as "dry and flat," yet Shaw's influence on contemporary thought was undeniable. His exploration of societal institutions like marriage, family, and capitalism resonated powerfully with young audiences, as noted by Eric Bentley.

Shaw’s creation of the public persona "G. B. S.", who fiercely engaged with critics, highlighted his complex relationship with fame. Despite being misunderstood as a mere provocateur, Shaw's intellectual legacy endured. By the time of his seventieth birthday, he had transformed from a notorious gadfly into a respected literary figure, his works continually revisited on stage and in print. T. S. Eliot later observed that Shaw’s once-controversial ideas had become mainstream, illustrating the enduring relevance and insight of Shaw’s contributions to literature and social discourse.

Next

Essays and Criticism

Loading...