Ludovico Ariosto

Start Free Trial

Other Literary Forms

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

As poet, Ludovico Ariosto is remembered chiefly as the continuer and modifier of the chivalric tradition initiated at the Ferrarese court by his predecessor Matteo Maria Boiardo (1441-1494), the author of the incomplete Orlando innamorato (1483, 1495; Orlando in love). This chivalric poem in octaves treats the passion of the paladin Orlando for the pagan Angelica. The poem was interrupted by Boiardo’s death in 1494, which coincided with France’s invasion of Italy. Because of the widespread use of artillery by King Charles VIII in the French campaign, chivalry—the material of Boiardo’s poem—was dealt a deadly blow. Approximately ten years later, Ariosto took up the story where Boiardo had stopped. The composition of this epic poem became a lifelong project for Ariosto; the third and definitive edition did not appear until 1532, the year before his death. Orlando furioso, as Ariosto entitled his masterpiece, in order to recall Seneca’s Hercules furens (c. 40-55 c.e.; Mad Hercules, 1581), is not, however, merely a conclusion to Boiardo’s unfinished opus. Rather, it is a brilliant restaging of the entire knightly tradition, from that portrayed in the poems and romances of the Carolingian and Breton cycles to that of the Franco-Venetian and Tuscan songs of chivalry. Ariosto wrote for a Ferrarese court that delighted, but no longer believed, in chivalric ideals; he mixed, therefore, illusion and reality in the same poem. He achieved a brilliant mix through an extensive use of fantasy and dependence on irony, the distinguishing characteristics of his poetic art. The result is the most acclaimed poem of Italian Renaissance literature and a work of art that has understandably eclipsed the author’s minor works for centuries.

Achievements

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Ludovico Ariosto is known as both dramatist and poet of the Renaissance court of Ferrara, where he served the Este family. As dramatist, he is often called the “founder of Italian comedy” but is generally esteemed less for the inherent greatness of his five plays than for his establishment of sixteenth century comedia erudita (erudite or learned comedy). Learned comedy was essentially a clever reworking of ancient plays by Plautus and Terence . It represented, in many respects, the antithesis of the unwritten and improvised plays of the commedia dell’arte that were so popular in the late Renaissance. It was also a reaction to the sacred representations that had been carried over from the Middle Ages. Critics have variously described cinquecento learned comedy as more spectacular than dramatic, unoriginal and lacking in vitality, much too conventional, a realistic portrayal of Italian Renaissance society, quite responsive to contemporary cultural expectations, and, according to Douglas Radcliff-Umstead, “a vital theater [created] from the model set by ancient Roman playwrights.”

Although Ariosto was not the first to compose a learned comedy in the vernacular, his first two plays greatly popularized the genre. George Gascoigne’s Supposes, performed at Gray’s Inn in 1566, is a translation or paraphrase of Ariosto’s second play, The Pretenders, and testifies to the initially widespread influence of some of Ariosto’s plays. Since the sixteenth century, however, that influence has been almost negligible because of general critical disdain for learned comedy. That disdain, however, has been modified during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as a chronology of the above descriptions of learned comedy, from Jacob Burckhardt in 1860 to Radcliff-Umstead in 1969, would indicate. In addition, the appearance in 1975 of the first English translation of all five of Ariosto’s plays and of Einaudi’s reproduction in 1976 of the 1954 Ricciardi edition of the plays in Italian are two events that have more recently contributed to the appreciation of Ariosto’s comedies in particular.

Bibliography

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Ascoli, Albert R. Ariosto’s Bitter Harmony: Crisis and Evasion in the Italian Renaissance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987. Ascoli’s close reading of Orlando furioso uncovers Ariosto’s “poetics of concord and discord,” the evasion of historical crises, and the relationship of this “text of crisis” to others of the genre.

Brand, C. P. Ludovico Ariosto: A Preface to the Orlando Furioso. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1974. An excellent overview of Ariosto’s life and works. Contains full chapters on life, lyrics, satires, and dramas while concentrating on a thematic study of the Orlando furioso. Emphasizes the opposition of love and war. Contains brief bibliographies for each chapter and two indexes.

Carroll, Clare. The “Orlando Furioso”: A Stoic Comedy. Tempe, Ariz.: MRTS, 1997. Analyzes the poem’s stoic view of harmony through a dialectic of contradictory meanings (wisdom through madness, juxtaposition of excess and restraint) and the balance of the poem’s structure. The poem is envisioned as “a miniature animated cosmos,” an organism ordered yet changing, accomplished through the imagery of circle, wheel, ring, and tondo.

Croce, Benedetto. Ariosto, Shakespeare, and Corneille. Translated by Douglas Ainslie. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1920. Reprint. New York: Russell & Russell, 1966. An extremely influential early modern essay on Orlando furioso. Rebutting the traditional criticism, Croce argues that the work achieves unity through the artist’s control of point of view and style, a unity which ultimately reflects the rhythm and harmony of God’s creation.

Finucci, Valeria, ed. Renaissance Transactions: Ariosto and Tasso. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1999. Collection of six articles on Orlando furioso by Ronald Martinez (Rinaldo’s journey as epic and romance), Daniel Javitch (Ariosto’s use of arms and love), Katherine Hoffmann (his juxtaposition of honor and avarice in the criticism of courtly society), Finucci (the problematic masculinity of Jocondo and Astolfo), Eric Nicholson (early theatrical adaptations), and Constance Jordan (the woman warrior Bradamante).

Gardner, Edmund G. The King of Court Poets: Ariosto. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1906. Reprint. New York: Haskell House, 1968. Gardner’s full-length biography contains a wealth of material and is easy to read. He includes a social, cultural, and political background of Ariosto’s life and work. Contains a dated bibliography, a useful index, and three foldout genealogies of the houses of Ariosto, Este, and Pio.

Griffin, Robert. Ludovico Ariosto. Boston: Twayne, 1974. Good introductory work on Ariosto, beginning with a chapter on his life and ending with a survey of criticism. Also contains chapters on lyrics, satires, dramas, and a thematic analysis of Orlando furioso. Argues that the unity of the poem rests on man’s inability to accept the will of fortune in a world beyond his limited comprehension. Contains chronology, notes, selected bibliography with brief annotations, and two indexes.

Javitch, Daniel. Proclaiming a Classic: The Canonization of “Orlando furioso.” Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1991. Studies sixteenth century reception of the poem and how readers determined its literary value.

MacPhail, Eric. “Ariosto and the Prophetic Moment.” MLN 116, no. 1 (January, 2001): 30-53. This essay, which looks at the historical context of Ariosto’s epic poem, helps readers understand the times in which he wrote.

Murtaugh, Kristen Olson. Ariosto and the Classical Simile. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980. Examines the use of similes in Ariosto’s works.

Rodini, Robert J., and Salvatore Di Maria. Ludovico Ariosto: An Annotated Bibliography of Criticism, 1956-1980. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1984. Contains 930 entries from journals, monographs, essays in books, North American dissertations, and books. Although meant primarily for scholars, the entry synopses are excellent and can easily be skimmed. Arranged by author but also contains detailed subject index and an index by works treated.

Wiggins, Peter De Sa. Figures in Ariosto’s Tapestry: Character and Design in the “Orlando Furioso.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. Agreeing with Galileo’s early comments on the psychological consistency of Ariosto’s characters and his exact knowledge of human nature, Wiggins suggests that their complex inner lives are universal human types. This invisible interior world, at odds with an exterior world of folly and depravity, is a major theme of the work. Excellent index and notes for each chapter.

Wiggins, Peter De Sa. The Satires of Ludovico Ariosto: A Renaissance Autobiography. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1976. A bilingual text, using the Italian original edited by Cesare Segre with Wiggins’ clear prose translations on the facing page. Each satire is placed in biographical and historical context with its own separate preface and notes. Argues that the narrator of the satires is an idealized poet courtier in typical situations rather than a factual mirror of Ariosto himself. Suggests that the satires share similarities with Orlando furioso: the theme of illusion and reality, the ironic humor, and the use of a dramatic persona as narrator.

Previous

Critical Essays

Next

Criticism