illustration of a woman holding a glass of wine and a man, Prufrock, standing opposite her

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

by T. S. Eliot

Start Free Trial

Student Question

What makes T.S. Eliot's poem non-traditional and why was it initially rejected in 1911?

Quick answer:

T.S. Eliot's poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was initially rejected in 1911 due to its non-traditional form. Unlike the pastoral Edwardian poetry of the time, it employed a stream-of-consciousness technique, mixed metrical structures, and unconventional rhyme schemes. Its complex structure, thematic depth, and use of Italian confused publishers, who struggled to recognize it as poetry. Despite this, it later became a hallmark of Modernist literature.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was T.S. Eliot's first published poem. Over five years elapsed between the time writing began and the time of publication, largely because Eliot had some considerable difficulty in convincing publishers that the poem was "poetry" at all. In 1910, when Eliot began writing the poem, poetry was generally struck in a pastoral Edwardian era marked by regular rhyme schemes and structures and "acceptable" topics like nature, love and death. "Prufrock" is not at all this sort of poem, exhibiting instead a stream-of-consciousness technique which leaps from thought to thought, something which would come to characterize Modernist writing, as well as would the use of mixed metrical structure. Indeed, it intermingles blank verse with free verse (at the time, extremely unusual in poetry) and traditional rhyming verse. We also find lines in which the assonance seems to fall in unusual places, which has the effect of pulling the reader into the strangeness of Prufrock's internal monologue:

And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin,
When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall,
Then how should I begin

Effectively, publishers rejected "Prufrock" initially because it was unique. They did not understand its strange shift from unrhymed iambic pentameter to rhyming couplets, or its use of Italian, or its stream-of-consciousness musings. It baffled in terms of structure, rhyme and theme. However, the early critical reception to the poem indicates that those who did understand it recognized immediately that it would come to change the face of poetry and how we understand it.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial