Biography
Louis Althusser, an influential philosopher, combined structuralist linguistics and Freudian psychoanalysis to formulate a modern, scientific, and antihumanist Marxism. His work prioritized structures and processes over individual subjects in the explanation of historical events. This approach marked a significant shift in Marxist theory, emphasizing the role of ideology and societal structures.
Early Life
Born in Algeria, Louis Althusser was the son of a banker and a mother who had married after losing her first love, Althusser's uncle, in World War I. Growing up in a predominantly monarchist and religious environment, Althusser initially shared these conservative views. By 1937, he had become active in the Catholic Church's youth movement. His life took a dramatic turn during World War II when he was captured by German forces and detained in a prisoner-of-war camp until the conflict ended.
Post-war, Althusser engaged with the leftist worker-priest movement and in 1946, formed a complex relationship with Hélène Rytman, an anti-Nazi communist eight years his senior. Despite losing his Catholic faith, he joined the French Communist Party (PCF) in 1948, continuing his involvement with the worker-priest movement until it was dissolved. Althusser’s relationship with Rytman faced challenges due to her expulsion from the PCF for alleged treason, an expulsion that the party demanded he honor, a demand he defied.
He pursued his education at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris, where he was profoundly influenced by philosophers of science such as Gaston Bachelard, Jean Cavailles, and Jules Canguileme. Under Bachelard's guidance, Althusser wrote his thesis on Hegel and secured second place in the rigorous agrégation de philosophie in 1948. His career as an educator then took root at the very institution where he had studied.
Life’s Work
During the 1950s, Althusser published sparingly. However, by the decade’s end, he produced Politics and History, delving into Montesquieu’s social philosophy and introducing his idea of history as devoid of a discernible goal or central subject. The early 1960s saw him dissect the nascent works of Karl Marx, culminating in the publication of For Marx in 1965 and the collaborative Reading Capital. These influential works coincided with a personal crisis that led to his hospitalization for severe depression.
In For Marx, Althusser posits that Marx’s early works were not authentically Marxist, arguing the true Marxist methodology emerged with The German Ideology. He charts a transition in Marx's works, aligning with orthodox views of Socialist and Soviet Communist doctrines, while countering the humanist interpretations of figures like Jean-Paul Sartre. Althusser contended that Marx's approach rejected humanism, culminating in a new way of analyzing history.
Althusser emphasizes that individuals are not central to Marx’s philosophy; rather, history unfolds as a process without a defined subject. He draws parallels to Bachelard’s concept of an epistemological break, likening it to Thomas S. Kuhn’s later idea of paradigm shifts. The shift from classical economic profit to Marx’s surplus value mirrors the scientific leap from phlogiston theories to modern chemistry.
Reading Capital sees Althusser examining Das Kapital through a psychoanalytic lens, identifying gaps and silences similar to how an analyst deciphers a patient’s discourse. Althusser argues that Marx's philosophical insights are embedded within his economic analysis rather than overtly stated. He refutes historicism, suggesting that societal structures account for historical processes, not a goal-oriented narrative.
Althusser introduces the concept of overdetermination, borrowing from Freud, to describe historical events as products of intersecting causes. He delineates societal evolution through modes of production, asserting that within any society, a dominant structure shapes its primary character. Even as political and ideological superstructures possess relative autonomy, they are ultimately governed by economic bases.
Evolving Views...
(This entire section contains 1140 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
on Philosophy
In the titular essay of Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, Althusser revises his stance on philosophy’s role. Initially a "theory of theoretical practice," philosophy became, to Althusser, a battleground for class struggle due to its inability to provide absolute justifications. His earlier rationalist theories gave way to a view of philosophy as a tool for persuasion rather than conclusive proof.
Althusser's essay "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses" shifts from Marx’s notion of ideology as mere falsehoods to viewing it as a means by which individuals find meaning in daily life. He identifies key institutions like schools and churches that propagate ideology, ensuring societal self-reproduction. In "Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists," he acknowledges the intertwined nature of science and ideology, recognizing the ideological undercurrents in scientific theory development.
Theoretical Framework and Influences
Althusser's theory of knowledge diverges from empiricism, echoing Immanuel Kant's philosophy; knowledge is not derived from direct experience but mediated by ideological frameworks. He proposed stages of knowledge, from experiential to theoretical, stressing that human understanding of reality is always conceptually filtered.
The influence of Baruch Spinoza is evident in Althusser's work, particularly the deterministic view of the universe and the idea of structures as immanent causes within society. Althusser's confrontation with empiricism leads him to assert that theories must correspond to real structures, drawing from Spinoza's belief in the partial truth of all knowledge.
Psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan also profoundly influenced Althusser. Emulating Lacan’s reading of Freud, Althusser approached Marx with a linguistic model, viewing social structures as timeless, akin to language. His correspondence and writings with Lacan reveal a deep engagement with psychoanalytic concepts, underscoring a personal connection with the discipline beyond theoretical interest.
Later Years and Academic Influence
Althusser’s academic career ended abruptly in 1980 after he strangled his wife, Hélène Rytman. Institutionalized and later released, he spent his remaining years writing about figures like Machiavelli and ancient philosophers, intermittently reminding Parisians of his former stature. His autobiography, The Future Lasts Forever, offers insight into his mental struggles and was published posthumously.
Despite the tragic end, Althusser’s impact on academia persisted. His Marxist-Leninist views, particularly his critique of Stalin’s humanism, resonated with numerous French and international scholars. Though his influence waned, it lingered through adopters and critics, with aspects of his theories permeating various disciplines, often uncredited.
In the decades following his institutionalization and the decline of communist ideals, Althusserianism faded, supplanted by postmodernist interpretations. Many who adopted these ideas credited philosophers like Foucault or Derrida, though Althusser’s concepts of decentered totality and non-teleological processes remained embedded within their frameworks.
Further Reading
For those interested in a deeper dive into Althusser's theories and influence, numerous works provide comprehensive analyses. "Postmodern Materialism and the Future of Marxist Theory" offers insights from contemporaries, while "Althusser's Marxism" provides a sympathetic introduction. Gregory Elliot’s and Alex Callinicos’s writings expand on Althusser's political and philosophical intersections.
Critiques of Althusserianism, such as "Structuralism and Marxism" by Adam Schaff, present alternative perspectives, while works like "The Poverty of Theory" by Edward P. Thompson challenge Althusser's theoretical rigidity. These readings afford a broad view of Althusser's legacy and the diverse reactions to his work.