"Incorrect omissions" simply refer to the absence of words that clarify the intent of the sentence. Statement #1, for example, is rather elementary, as it could be construed as suggesting that women know more about children than they know about men. The intention of the statement, however, is very different: women know more about children than men know about children. Women are more knowledgeable than men on that topic is what the statement intends to convey. I have added the words "understand children" at the end of statement #1, therefore, to clarify its meaning. Similarly, statement #2 can lead to a misunderstanding if it is interpreted as suggesting that Johnny "never has" something other than study geometry. Unlike statement #1, statement #2 would be unlikely to lead to confusion, however, as the article is clear in its intent. What follows are suggested corrections to each of the three statements:
1. Women, on the whole, understand children better than men understand children.
2. Johnny has never studied his geometry and never will study his geometry.
3. A liberal arts background is excellent for many professions including those of lawyers and doctors.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.