Student Question

How do the authors perceive the relationship between individuals and external forces in "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson and "Imagine no Heaven" by Salman Rushdie?

Quick answer:

In both "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson and "Imagine no Heaven" by Salman Rushdie, external forces significantly impact individual identity. Jackson's story illustrates how the lottery tradition defines community dynamics and personal identity, leading individuals to conform without question. Similarly, Rushdie critiques religion's role in shaping identities and inciting violence. Both authors warn against the unquestioned acceptance of external forces, highlighting their potential for abuse and control over self-definition.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In Jackson's "The Lottery" and Rushdie's "Imagine no heaven," external forces play a large role in regulating a person's identity.

The external forces that Jackson and Rushdie see as forming people's identity are all-encompassing. Jackson's lottery is inescapable in defining identity. The lottery determines people's opinions of themselves and of one another. Prior to the lottery's results, the entire town seems an ideal of community and cohesion. As the drawing takes place, Mrs. Delacroix and Tessie are chatting congenially with one another as friends do. However, once Tessie's name is chosen, Mrs. Delacroix immediately "selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands." There is no hesitation in Mrs. Delacroix's turning on a friend as she encourages Mrs. Dunbar to do the same. Tessie was a part of the community. Literally and figuratively, she stood with them. Yet, when it is clear that she has...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

the paper with the black dot on it, they move away, surrounding her as she stands in the middle.

In "Imagine no heaven," Rushdie sees religion in the same way. Rushdie sees social construction around religion as culturally and individually defining identity. Rushdie believes that religions set in motion the "wars of the godly against the largely defenceless." Just as the lottery defines human identity in Jackson's short story, Rushdie sees "priests, and the fictions on whose behalf they claim to speak," regulating the way individuals see themselves and other people.

In both works, the external reality that defines individual identity is powerful because no one questions it. Jackson presents a community unwilling to "upset" the town's tradition. Old Man Warner condemns anyone for even suggesting that the lottery should be questioned. In the same way, Rushdie displays the reality of violence that accompanies unquestioned religious fervor:

They are wars of the godly against the largely defenceless—American fundamentalists against pro-choice doctors, Iranian mullahs against their country's Jewish minority, Hindu fundamentalists in Bombay against that city's increasingly fearful Muslims.

Jackson and Rushdie suggest that when external forces are not questioned, a potential for abuse results. Both works are similar in warning of the power of singular forces to regulate and control self-definition.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How do "Two Kinds" by Amy Tan and "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson portray the relationship between external forces and self-definition? What similarities exist between them?

In Tan's "Two Kinds" and Jackson's "The Lottery," social expectation regulates in self-definition.

Social expectation plays a large role in forming June's identity and in guiding Suyan's hopes for her daughter. Suyuan believes that her daughter can be a child prodigy because, in America, "you could be anything you wanted to be." This mythology is associated with the dream of unlimited hope in America. Aspiring to this standard causes her to embrace a "Shirley Temple" prodigy image for her daughter. At first, June also embraces this external reality in the way she sees herself:

In fact, in the beginning I was just as excited as my mother, maybe even more so. I pictured this prodigy part of me as many different images, and I tried each one on for size. I was a dainty ballerina girl standing by the curtain, waiting to hear the music that would send me floating on my tiptoes. I was like the Christ child lifted out of the straw manger, crying with holy indignity. I was Cinderella stepping from her pumpkin carriage with sparkly cartoon music filling the air.

June and Suyan form their definition of identity in accordance to an external reality. Eventually, June rejects this definition. The hurt this triggers between mother and daughter reflects the zeal with which both allowed something external to influence both of their identities. The social expectation of how people in America are supposed to act regulates June's self-definition, and her mother's hopes for her.

In Jackson's "The Lottery," self-definition is seen in the social expectation of the lottery. The town's tradition defines how people see themselves. Old Man Warner articulates the social importance of the town's ritual:

Pack of crazy fools [people who want to get rid of the lottery]...  Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live that way for a while. Used to be a saying about Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon... There’s always been a lottery...

The lottery is an embedded part of cultural practice and individual identity. It regulates the way people in the town see themselves. Old Man Warner's beliefs link the lottery to agricultural bounty, social advancement, and cultural practice.

Jackson shows how the people in the town view their own identity in accordance to the lottery. For example, Tessie Hutchinson looked forward to the lottery. She was excited and eager to attend the proceedings. At the story's start, she is joking with other members of the community and even getting laughs when she loudly encourages her husband to get the family's slip of paper from the box. Prior to being selected, she defines herself in a socially prominent way. However, once it is clear that she and her family are selected, Tessie defines herself as a victim. She protests the lottery's procedure. When it is evident that she has been chosen, she defines herself as victim of a unfair and unrighteous practice. Tessie's self-definition is external. It shows the extent to which the lottery defines individuals. 

In both works, social reality plays a significant role in self-definition. External forces regulate the self-perceptions of Suyan, June, and Tessie.

Approved by eNotes Editorial