Nicholas Nickleby, one of Dickens' celebrated works, concludes with the joyful unions of siblings in marriage. Yet, what drives Edgar to alter this finale, introducing a second Smike into the narrative?

Consider the impact on women's life decisions in nineteenth-century Britain, where the law denied married women the right to own property. How did this restriction shape their choices and futures?

Reflect on Nicholas's contentious nature. Does this characteristic diminish his appeal, or does it enhance his depth? Share your perspective on this intriguing question.

Delve into the significance of wealth within this play. What pivotal role does money play in shaping the story's events and characters?