Lev Shestov

Start Free Trial

A review of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Nietzsche

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Below, Strong gives a mixed appraisal of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Nietzsche. Beginning his adult life as a lawyer, Lev Shestov (1866-1938) came to philosophy by way of literary criticism. His first book (1898) dealt with Shakespeare and was soon followed by the two long essays which have been translated for the present volume, The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche: Philosophy and Preaching (1900) and Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Philosophy of Tragedy (1903). Written in a rambling, non-rigorous, and impressionistic style, they nevertheless convey aesthetic power. The subtitle of the second essay indicates a similarity to the interpretation given Dostoevsky by Berdyaev and Rozanov. It is, furthermore, in the tragic view of life that the key to these two works may be found. For, despite their early successes, all three writers under discussion experienced moral crises during their middle years, (a torment evidently undergone by Shestov himself during the 1890s). The metaphor of 'gazing into the abyss' is employed, and the horrors of the human condition which they saw there impelled each man to seek salvation.
SOURCE: A review of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Nietzsche, in The Russian Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, July, 1971, pp. 314-15.

[Below, Strong gives a mixed appraisal of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Nietzsche.]

Tolstoy's solution (too harshly condemned, I think by Shestov) was to equate God with "the good" and to preach fraternal love. Dostoevsky's radically egotistical Underground Man, as embodied in Raskolnikov, for example, had to be saved by Orthodox Christianity. And Nietzsche, for whose courage Shestov expresses the greatest admiration, eventually succumbed to the doctrines of amor fati and the Ubermensch. Within our space limitations here, Shestov's own philosophy must briefly be summarized as anti-idealistic and anti-rationalistic. In a sense, it was at least tangential to religious existentialism. Late in life, moreover, Shestov wrote a book on Kierkegaard, and an English translation has recently appeared.

Bernard Martin's introduction is competent, though overly long (thirty pages) because of many needless quotations from the texts which follow. One puzzling omission is Shestov's real family name (Schwarzman). A knowledge of this thinker's Jewish background would provide another dimension to Shestov's passionate moral fervor and to his own solution: belief in a predominantly Old Testament God for whom "one must sacrifice everything."

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Previous

A review of Athens and Jerusalem

Next

Shestov, or the Purity of Despair

Loading...