Bonhoeffer is best understood as a seeker and not as a builder of systems. His writings prior to his imprisonment show a thoughtful, intense person confronting the theological and personal problems created by Friedrich Nietzsche’s statement that God is dead. His personal quest came down to one key question: If belief in God was no longer viable, what remained of Christianity?
To Bonhoeffer, the doctrines, practices, and church structures of the past had been meaningful in their own time but were rendered useless by the advances of reason, science, and modern urban civilization. Theologically, Bonhoeffer’s main concern was the relevance of Christianity in an urban-secular age. The problem, as he saw it, was twofold: Belief in an all-powerful, personal God who was active in the world had evaporated, and organized churches had replaced Christian commitment with a religiosity characterized by modest demands, easy forgiveness, social respectability, and promises of better things in the life to come.
Bonhoeffer found the answer to his quest in the life and teachings of Jesus, which he sought to apply to his own time, stripped of the theological interpretations placed upon them. The challenge of the church, as Bonhoeffer saw it, was to make the teachings of Jesus relevant to an age which had rejected traditional Christian doctrines, practices, and values.
Bonhoeffer had a gift for expressing his theological ideas in striking terms which caught the imagination of his readers. “A world come of age” meant that modern man had outgrown the childlike concept of a personal God who intervenes in the affairs of men and who requires worship and devotion to maintain His goodwill. “Christ existing as community” referred to the church, which should apply the teachings of Jesus to the immediate hopes, needs, and sufferings of an uncaring and often cruel society. “Christianity without religion” meant that meaningless doctrines and rituals should be abandoned to...
(The entire section is 814 words.)