The Letters of Lewis Carroll
As Morton N. Cohen tells us in the Preface to The Letters of Lewis Carroll, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson took letter-writing seriously—so much so, in fact, that on most days of his life he spent long hours in correspondence. Shortly before his twenty-ninth birthday, he began to keep a serially numbered register of the letters he received and sent. By his death, he had reached No. 98,721. To this impressive total must be added those he sent over ten years in his office as curator at Christ Church, and, of course, those he wrote and received before age twenty-nine. We are not likely, therefore, to see a collected edition of Dodgson’s letters simply because of their sheer bulk, even were they all available.
Yet few of Dodgson’s letters have appeared in print, making Cohen’s edition immensely valuable to historians and students of Carroll in particular and the period in general. Of the vast total produced, no more than several hundred have been printed previously, scattered in various biographies, collections, and published diaries. Cohen and Green gathered more than four thousand letters for this edition, of which more than thirteen hundred are here published. For reasons of space, almost all the letters are those Dodgson himself wrote, with notes where needed for the reader to understand the gist of the correspondence. Most of them are “private” letters: that is, those written to friends, acquaintances, and family members on the small matters of day-today living—comings and goings, holiday arrangements, invitations and reunions, the presenting and acknowledging of gifts. Cohen has also included “representative samples” of more public correspondence: letters to the press, to his publishers, illustrators, and so on.
Cohen’s The Letters of Lewis Carroll will greatly benefit historians and biographers, the readers for whom the edition was almost certainly designed; it is a relatively minor drawback (though still a real one) that the edition will have limited usefulness to students of written English. In an oddly contradictory passage in the Preface. Cohen states that one of his goals is to remain “as faithful as possible to this painstaking letter-writer and to his orthographic gems and oddities.” He therefore preserves “almost all” of Dodgson’s punctuation, changing it “only when ambiguity required a change.” Readers must hope that Cohen always resolved the ambiguity in favor of Dodgson’s meaning, since they will have no idea where those ambiguities occur. Similarly, despite the assertion that he has preserved almost all of Dodgson’s punctuation, Cohen tells us that extended dashes “are everywhere” in the letters, and have always been replaced by commas or periods; these long strokes “usually differ from Dodgson’s dashes,” which have been retained. One is left with the suspicion that the punctuation of the printed letters, despite assurances to the contrary, may differ considerably from their original form, and hence gives us a picture of doubtful reliability of Victorian practice in friendly correspondence.
But this drawback does not affect the main intention of the book: to give a rich, running account of Dodgson’s thought as he expressed it to his correspondents; that purpose the edition fulfills. Given the popular picture of the Oxford don, the reader with little knowledge of Dodgson’s life may be surprised to discover the astonishing range of his contacts: even in this relatively small sampling—perhaps only a few percent of the total letters—one finds familiar names occurring again and again: people of prominence in government, church, and academic circles, as well as figures in literature and the arts—George du Maurier, the family of George MacDonald, Coventry Patmore, Christina and Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Elizabeth Sewell, Alfred Tennyson, Ellen Terry and other members of the famous acting family, Mary Arnold (Mrs. Humphry Ward), daughter...
(The entire section is 2,147 words.)