Leslie Fiedler

Start Free Trial

New Books: 'No! In Thunder'

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

[Mr. Fiedler is a] dedicated and insistent "nay-sayer," [and] the very title of his present collection of essays [No! In Thunder] … tells us that he is embarking on a voyage of destruction; that he is intent on demolishing the "household gods" of both popular ignorance and the academic credo of the "new critics."

The material in the present volume covers an almost fantastic range of interests: from Hamlet to Jack Kerouac; from Oedipus Rex to the Leopold-Loeb trial; from Huckleberry Finn to the present role of the Negro in American society. If the range in subject matter is unbelievable so is the range of the book's style: the most incomprehensible academic jargon of the mythic school of critics cheek by jowl with pungent, direct statements of the author's personal likes and dislikes. For an example of Mr. Fiedler at his worst, try the following sentence: "There is something beyond symbolism in the sense that the ritual act or its story does not stand for but is the archetypal fact; and as this ambivalence of the durative-punctual persists in poetry it has been recognized as the Concrete Universal." There is a happier Fiedler, however. One frequently finds something as felicitous and right as this (he is talking of the Southern agrarian critics: Brooks, Warren, Tate, et al., breaking out of the cane brakes in the thirties): "They clutched not Marx in one hand and a 'proletarian novel' in the other, but a volume of neometaphysical poetry in one and of 'close' criticism in the other—only to disappear into the colleges to the North, still crying the slogans of agrarianism to their students, who were, alas, only interested in John Donne." This is wonderful stuff; the book is full of it.

It is difficult to separate the nonsense from the sense in Mr. Fiedler's work; but the very best thing in it is the essay on the limitations of the "A poem should not mean but be" school of criticism: an essay in which Fiedler makes a remarkably strong case for the uses of biography in critical studies of poetry.

There is something here to offend almost everyone and the author seems actually to go out of his way to offend. Much of No! In Thunder is in the worst possible taste; much of it seems close to angry raving; but there are passages of sheer brilliance (I use the word because Mr. Fiedler dislikes it); and there is a liveliness, a challenging quality which covers a multitude of sins. The author cannot compel you to agree with him but he can, and does, make you listen. (pp. 188-89)

Stephen P. Ryan, "New Books: 'No! In Thunder'," in Catholic World (copyright 1960 by The Missionary Society of St. Paul the Apostle in the State of New York; used by permission), Vol. CXCII, No. 1149, December, 1960, pp. 188-89.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Previous

Accent on the Negative

Next

Literature on the Couch

Loading...