Christianity has always taken a somewhat skeptical approach to “the wisdom of men” as compared with “the power of God” (1 Corinthians 2:5). Indeed, Jesus occasionally showed the same distrust of professional teachers when confronted by Pharisees as Socrates did when faced with Sophists. Writing at a time when university classes in divinity had become sophisticated at least, and occasionally sophistic, Nicholas found it appropriate to mention Socrates at the outset. “Socrates believed he knew nothing except that he did not know,” he wrote, quoting Plato’s Apologia Skratous (399-390 b.c.e.; Apology, 1675). Christian scholars can do no better than to learn their own ignorance and its consequence: their absolute reliance on God.
Nicholas realizes that the world looks different when viewed sub species aeternitatis (from the vantage of eternity). No one on earth would think that a triangle could become a line or that the Earth could move around the Sun, but Christianity allows one to think anagogically and to try to find the spiritual sense in God’s word. The same sort of thinking can lead to a new vision of the Creation and an enhanced appreciation of the Creator.
Nicholas’s doctrine of the coincidence of opposites seemed sophistical to some contemporaries. It may remind a modern reader of Parmenides on the lack of difference between being and nonbeing. However, it was meant...
(The entire section is 408 words.)