Critical Context

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Last Updated on May 6, 2015, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 145

Benjamin Lee Whorf, both as student and colleague, has been closely identified with Edward Sapir. This identification has been so strong that their jointly held belief that an individual’s picture of external reality is largely determined by the way his language has structured that reality is known to linguists as...

(The entire section contains 145 words.)

See This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Benjamin Lee Whorf, both as student and colleague, has been closely identified with Edward Sapir. This identification has been so strong that their jointly held belief that an individual’s picture of external reality is largely determined by the way his language has structured that reality is known to linguists as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Unhappily for both scholars, their hypothesis has been considerably attacked by other linguists. Words such as “naive,” “far-fetched,” and “simplistic” are often applied to Whorf’s detailed analytic work with North and South American Indian languages.

To be sure, some of the conclusions Whorf drew from his close analysis of particular languages may merit skepticism. It would be difficult to claim, however, that the underlying hypothesis set forth by Sapir and Whorf is false. Language does serve as a philosophical screen, controlling and limiting the speaker’s view of external reality.

Illustration of PDF document

Download Language, Thought, and Reality Study Guide

Subscribe Now
Previous

Analysis