Lancelot: Or, The Knight of the Cart

by Chrétien de Troyes

Start Free Trial

Critical Overview

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Chrétien de Troyes is celebrated as the pioneer of Arthurian romance, seamlessly blending the chivalric exploits of King Arthur and his knights with the nuanced dynamics of courtly love. His work, particularly the romance of Lancelot, is renowned for introducing iconic elements such as Camelot and Lancelot's passionate affair with Queen Guinevere. Over time, critical perspectives on Chrétien's work have evolved, acknowledging the complexity and depth of his narrative techniques and thematic explorations.

Origins and Inspirations

Chrétien de Troyes embarked on the creation of Lancelot, the third in his series of five romances, with the backing of his patroness, Countess Marie of Champagne. In the poem's prologue, Chrétien credits Marie with supplying the "sense and subject matter" of the narrative, though the specifics of her input remain elusive. It is speculated that Marie, also a patron of Andreas Capellanus—author of The Art of Courtly Love—may have influenced Chrétien to exemplify Capellanus’s principles through his narrative. This potential directive might have posed a challenge for Chrétien, who elsewhere condemned extramarital love, perhaps contributing to his inability to finish the poem, leaving Godefroy de Lagny to complete its final segments.

Early Criticism and Sources

Initial assessments of Lancelot focused on tracing Chrétien's sources, leading scholars to conclude that the story merged two ancient tales: a Celtic myth of abduction and rescue, and a folklore narrative known as the Fair Unknown, where an anonymous figure gains recognition and valor. Critics initially deemed Chrétien's additions to these tales as incoherent, suggesting a lack of genuine interest in crafting the poem. However, such views were eventually reevaluated as later scholars recognized the deliberate complexity and thematic richness of Chrétien's work.

Acknowledging Literary Complexity

Modern critics have since revised the earlier consensus, appreciating Lancelot for its intricate structure and thematic depth. The romance is now viewed as a carefully constructed and complete narrative, with the love confession between Lancelot and Guinevere at its core. Chrétien’s technique of molt bele conjointure, or "beautifully ordered composition," is exemplified through the interwoven, symmetrical scenes that reflect and amplify one another. This realization has shifted perceptions, understanding the work not as a jumbled collection of tales but as a masterful and cohesive narrative.

Ambiguity in Courtly Love

Chrétien’s nuanced treatment of courtly love within Lancelot is now seen as evidence of his sophisticated narrative capabilities. Far from being confused or ambivalent, Chrétien skillfully presents a narrative open to multiple interpretations. His portrayal allows readers to explore the narrative threads and arrive at diverse conclusions. The poem’s inherent ambiguities, particularly regarding the conflicts between love and reason, invite readers to reflect on the characters’ actions and the moral implications embedded within the story.

Moral and Ethical Conflicts

The tension between love and rationality is poignantly illustrated when Lancelot hesitates before entering the dwarf’s cart. While Lancelot chooses love over reason, aligning with the ideals of a courtly lover, the narrator remains impartial in his recounting. This impartiality encourages readers to form their judgments on Lancelot’s dichotomous role as both Arthur’s bravest knight and a traitor through his affair with Guinevere. The poem intricately ties Lancelot’s martial prowess to his romantic devotion, underscoring an ironic service to Arthur rooted in betrayal.

Reader Interpretations

The varied portrayals of Lancelot and Guinevere demand thoughtful interpretation from the audience, evident in the diverse critical responses to the work. Lancelot’s unwavering devotion to Guinevere can be seen as the epitome of courtly love or as a sign of folly. Similarly, his reverence for Guinevere’s comb and hair, described with religious intensity, prompts readers to assess whether such veneration elevates or undermines the...

(This entire section contains 746 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

sacredness of their love. The narrative’s tone, often perceived as lightly ironic, further complicates these interpretations, leaving readers to discern whether Chrétien subtly mocks or appreciates the lovers’ exaggerated passions.

The Enduring Legacy of Chrétien de Troyes

Chrétien’s innovation in narrative structure, character development, and psychological exploration has earned him recognition as a precursor to the modern novel. His influence on the Arthurian romance tradition is undeniable, with the enduring tale of Lancelot, Guinevere, and Arthur continuing to captivate audiences. This quintessential romantic triangle remains a fertile ground for reinterpretation, as evidenced by its persistent presence in contemporary literature and film. Chrétien’s legacy endures, inviting each generation to engage anew with the timeless themes of love, betrayal, and honor.

Previous

Characters

Next

Analysis

Loading...