Themes: Power and Judgement
From a purely philosophical standpoint, the king’s tribunal is the ultimate form of poetic justice; however, the tribunal does not exist within a vacuum. Though the ultimate decision between the doors lies with the accused, the laws of the land and the choice of sentencing is in the hands of the king. The flaw of the system is not in the method of judgement, but rather in the absolute authority of the king to subject anyone he finds disagreeable to the whims of chance. In the case of the young courtier, his guilt in loving the princess is not in question; however, whether his love is truly criminal is subject to debate. According to the king, the mere act of engaging in a consensual, reciprocal relationship with the princess is enough to condemn the courtier. Yet one is left to wonder whether the same situation would still be declared criminal if it did not involve the king’s daughter.
The ability of the tribunal to deliver unbiased justice is further complicated when the young courtier is placed on trial, as his lover, the princess, disrupts the chance-based nature of the tribunal by learning what is behind each door in advance. No more can the tribunal claim to be solely in the hands of the accused, nor can the ultimate judgment be said to be fate at work. Instead, the princess has made herself judge, jury, and executioner to her lover. It is no longer the courtier’s choice, or even the king's desire, that matters; the princess has all of the power and she alone decides whether the courtier lives or dies.
Expert Q&A
Is the trial system in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" fair?
The trial system in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" is generally considered unfair. The accused's fate is determined by chance rather than justice, leading to potential death or forced marriage regardless of guilt or innocence. This system lacks proportionate punishment and due process. However, some argue that the story's semi-barbaric context and its intent to provoke thought suggest the trial's fairness is subjective, aligning with the king's character and the story's themes.
Why does the king disapprove of the youth's love for his daughter in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"?
The king does not approve of the youth's love for the king's daughter in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" because the man is of low social status. The young man is not royalty, and it does not seem that he has one of the more exclusive titles of nobility. The youth is nowhere near the princess in terms of status, so the king does not approve of their relationship.
In "The Lady, or the Tiger?", what does the king's "self-communing" suggest about his rule?
The king's "self-communing" in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" highlights his authoritarian rule, as he makes decisions unilaterally without consulting advisors. This term implies he is solely guided by his own opinions, reinforcing his despotic nature. His unchecked authority allows him to implement a peculiar justice system based on chance in a public arena, where the accused must choose between two doors, leading to either marriage or death, illustrating his whimsical yet tyrannical governance.
How does the king’s arena serve as an agent of poetic justice in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"
In "The Lady, or the Tiger?," the king's arena serves as an agent of poetic justice by implementing a justice system based on chance, reflecting the king's "barbaric idealism." The accused chooses between two doors: one hiding a lady (reward) and the other a tiger (punishment). This system, seen as fair by the king and society, offers a unique blend of chance and choice, contrasting with Roman arenas that focused solely on violent entertainment.
Which lines suggest the king's determinism in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"
The king's determinism in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" is evident in his use of the arena as an agent of "poetic justice," where fate is determined by chance. The lines describing the arena as a place where crime is punished or virtue rewarded by "impartial and incorruptible chance" highlight his belief in leaving judgment to fate. Additionally, the king's pleasure in watching events unfold, regardless of the outcome, underscores his deterministic approach.
How does the author convey the theme of leadership and its responsibilities in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"
The theme of leadership and its responsibilities in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" is conveyed through the actions of a "semi-barbaric" king who uses a public arena for justice, reflecting both his authority and moral ambiguity. The king's justice system, based on chance, raises questions about the fairness and ethics of his leadership. The king's personal biases and entertainment motives highlight the complexity of leadership, while the unresolved ending underscores the consequences of choices made by those in power.
How would you explain the king's "perfect" system of justice?
The king's "perfect" system of justice relies on destiny and chance to determine the fate of the accused, eliminating bias or prejudice from judges or juries. This supposedly impartial method avoids personal involvement, which the king views as ideal. However, the system is flawed as it overlooks the honesty of the accuser, ignores extenuating circumstances, and disregards free will, raising questions about its fairness and effectiveness.
The king's method of administering justice in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"
The king's method of administering justice involves a public trial where the accused must choose between two doors. Behind one door is a lady, symbolizing innocence and reward, while behind the other is a ferocious tiger, symbolizing guilt and punishment. This method relies on chance rather than evidence and reflects the king's arbitrary and whimsical sense of justice.
Why do you think the king in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" created his justice system?
The king in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" created his justice system to reflect his semi-barbaric nature, prioritizing appearance over substance. The system's randomness gives an illusion of fairness, satisfying his subjects' desire for poetic justice while distancing the king from the responsibility of inflicting pain. By attributing outcomes to chance, the king consolidates his power and makes it difficult for his subjects to challenge his rule.
How was the barbaric system justified in "The Lady, or the Tiger?"
The barbaric system in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" was justified by the king's absolute power and the ancient societal norms. The king ruled through force and fear, with no democratic processes or representation for the people. This autocratic rule allowed him to stage spectacles like the trial by ordeal, as the populace had no choice but to accept his authority. The story reflects the era's acceptance of such tyrannical governance.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
