The Killer Angels

by Michael Shaara

Start Free Trial

Editor's Choice

How does Armistead and Hancock's relationship define the war in The Killer Angels?

Quick answer:

Armistead and Hancock's relationship in The Killer Angels illustrates the personal conflicts of the Civil War, where friends often found themselves on opposing sides. Despite their deep friendship, Armistead, a Confederate, and Hancock, a Union officer, face the tragic reality of potentially fighting each other. This personal tragedy reflects the broader conflict, as political and economic interests divided many close relationships during the war, exemplified by Armistead's death and Hancock's survival.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Before the Civil War, Lewis Armstead and Winfield Hancock are the best of friends. When the American Civil War reaches them, they end up on opposite sides of the battle fields. Lewis Armstead ends up fighting on the Confederate side of the war, and Winfield Hancock ends up fighting on the Union side of the war. The two are devastated about the chance of having to face each other in battle, as they care deeply for one another. Unfortunately, they end up having to fight a battle against each other. This sad reality was the case for many people who fought in the American Civil War, as Confederate and Union lines were drawn by politicians who only had economic and political interests in mind.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The American Civil War has always been described as one in which brothers often fought brothers and where friends often met face-to-face on the battlefield. Colonel...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Joshua Chamberlain claims that the war is about

“Killing of brothers. This whole war is concerned with the killing of brothers.”

Such was the case of Confederate Brigadier General Lewis Armistead and Union Major General Winfield Scott Hancock. Before the war, they were best friends, "closer than brothers," and Armistead seems to have had a spiritual if not romantic connection with Hancock's wife, Mary. Armistead, a brigade commander in Major General George Pickett's infantry division, has long worried that he may one day face off against Hancock on the battlefield. He wants to see Hancock one last time, but not under fire. Armistead even considers crossing enemy lines to pay Hancock a visit under a flag of truce, a notion suggested and approved by his corps commander, Lieutenant General James Longstreet. But Armistead doesn't consider it proper, and instead he hopes that Hancock's Union corps will not be engaged when Armistead's men are sent into action. But such is not the case: In a simple twist of fate, Hancock's II Corps will defend the center of the Union line on the final day of battle, and Pickett's division--with Armistead's brigade--will take direct aim at Hancock's men. Armistead is distracted at the time of the attack; he is thinking of his last meeting with Hancock's wife, remembering his farewell: "It may be for years, it may be forever." And it is Hancock's men who fatally wound Armistead, who manages to ask a Union officer to take him to see his friend. But Hancock has also been badly wounded, Armistead learns, and Armistead

"... sends his regrets. Will you tell him... how very sorry I am..."  (Friday, July 3, 1863--Chapter 4)

One man dies--Armistead--and one man lives--Hancock--joining the tens of thousands of other Gettysburg casualties in blue and grey, but Americans all.

Approved by eNotes Editorial