1. While Stevenson regarded Kidnapped as his finest novel, some critics argue that David Balfour is superior. Is the sequel a more accomplished literary work?

2. Although understanding eighteenth-century Scottish history isn't essential to appreciate the book, many readers in England and Scotland in 1886 would have had some familiarity with that period. How does studying the era of a "historical" novel enhance comprehension of the book? How do Scottish terms and expressions lend authenticity to the novel and help contemporary readers grasp eighteenth-century Scotland?

3. At one juncture, David criticizes the Highlanders he's encountered, telling Alan they could all use a bath. What is Stevenson's perspective on these unique individuals? Is he empathetic or critical?

4. The book's plot has been described as episodic. Are there any episodes that could be removed without undermining the novel's structure and impact?

5. Stevenson underscores the Highlanders' loyalty to their chief. Does this sentiment appear valid and realistic? Are there rational reasons for this attitude? Is it more comprehensible within a historical context?