(Critical Guide to British Fiction)

Although essentially biographical in conception, Kepler deals with the great astronomer’s productive period. This period covers the years from his exile from Graz in 1598 to his death in 1630. John Banville provides the reader with much of the relevant material concerning his protagonist’s early years, but such material primarily dealing with family and education has an influence on Johannes Kepler’s development, which he may be seen to spend his career revising. For the most part, however, background material is kept firmly in the background. Rather than presenting the story of the formation of Kepler’s mind, the novel centers on the protagonist’s struggle to preserve a mind of his own.

This focus has a number of distinctive effects on the shape and gist of the novel. First, it enables Banville to scramble and elide the chronology of Kepler’s life. The best evidence of this approach is in the section “Harmonice Mundi” (named, like each of the novel’s five sections, for one of Kepler’s scientific treatises). The section consists of selections from Kepler’s correspondence. By presenting them out of sequence, however, Banville lends them a thematic unity which would be lost in a more linear, and ostensibly more unified, manner. In addition, the deliberate shuffling of the correspondence is most telling in a section of the novel whose title is most evocative of harmony. Thus, Banville deftly uses his approach not only as a...

(The entire section is 591 words.)


(Critical Guide to British Fiction)

Campbell, James. Review in New Statesman. CCI (February 6, 1981), p. 21.

Irish University Review. XI (Spring, 1981). Special Banville issue.

McCormach, Russell. Review in The New York Times Book Review. May 29, 1983, p. 10.

Peters, Andrew. Review in Library Journal. CVIII (June 1, 1983), p. 1152.

Prescott, Peter S. Review in Newsweek. CI (May 2, 1983), p. 78.