Katherine Philips Criticism

Katherine Philips (1632–1664), a distinguished English poet and translator, is a pivotal figure in literary history. Known for her writings that celebrated female friendship through the lens of seventeenth-century love poetry, Philips's work initially garnered acclaim during her lifetime. Using the pseudonym "Orinda," she also gained recognition for her translations of French plays, particularly those of Corneille. Despite her prominence, Philips's literary contributions were largely forgotten until a critical reappraisal in the late twentieth century, as noted by Elizabeth H. Hageman.

Born into a family with connections to literary figures like John Milton and Andrew Marvell, Philips married John Philips at sixteen, yet continued to pursue her intellectual interests. She established a "Society of Friendship," a circle of intellectuals that inspired many of her poems. While Philips's Royalist inclinations were well-known, her works critiqued the social constraints of her time, a theme explored by Elaine Hobby in her analysis of Philips's public persona.

Despite the decline in Philips's reputation as neoclassicism rose to prominence, recent scholarship has re-evaluated her ability to navigate a male-dominated literary scene. Critics like Claudia Limbert argue that Philips's strategic self-presentation allowed her to subtly challenge gender norms while maintaining respect as a literary figure. Her nuanced use of poetic language and themes of disguise, as examined by Celia Easton, showcases her adeptness at critiquing dominant cultural narratives.

Philips's exploration of Platonic love, as expressed in her poetry focused on intense female friendships, was unconventional for her time. Her adaptation of themes commonly explored by male poets to address affection between women is analyzed by Harriette Andreadis. Although her poetry was often privately circulated, which contributed to both her contemporary acclaim and the complexity of her legacy, this duality has been scrutinized by scholars like Lucy Brashear. The debate over whether her portrayal of love between women advocates for lesbian relationships or represents intense friendships continues, with perspectives provided by Travis DuPriest.

Recent feminist scholarship has sparked renewed interest in Philips's work. As Paula Loscocco suggests, her posthumous decline was partly due to shifts in gender perspectives. By understanding how Philips managed to cultivate a national reputation amidst societal constraints, scholars like Kathleen M. Swaim and Brashear further illuminate her enduring influence. Her alliances with influential men, examined by Maureen E. Mulvihill, highlight an intricate network that supported her career while allowing her to critique societal norms.

Read Full Introduction

Katherine Philips Criticism

Contents