Student Question
Why is the trial's relocation in chapter 3 of Just Mercy significant?
Quick answer:
The trial's relocation in Chapter 3 is significant because it highlights systemic racial bias. Walter McMillian's lawyers request a change of venue to ensure a fair trial, fearing bias in Monroeville. Although the judge and prosecution agree, they move it to Baldwin County, which is predominantly white, resulting in an all-white jury. This action underscores how legal systems can exploit venue changes to maintain racial bias, despite laws against such practices.
Bryan Stevenson’s memoir Just Mercy contains the true stories of some of Stevenson’s cases as a legal advocate. While he does tell the stories of many different cases, the storyline mainly centers on the case of Walter McMillian, a young African American man who was charged with murder and sentenced to death in Alabama in the 1980s.
In chapter three, Walter’s lawyers file a motion to have the case moved to another county in order to avoid possible bias within the jury; they believe that if the case is held in Monroeville, Walter will not have a fair trial. Surprisingly, both the judge and the prosecution, Ted Pearson, agree to move the trial; however, when the case does get moved, the prosecution arranges to move the trial over to Baldwin County, a nearby county that is almost entirely white. As a result of this move, instead of getting a local jury, Walter ends up having an entirely white jury. This is significant because though there are laws in place to protect accused citizens from racist jury tampering, racist juries can still be created legal means. Stevenson also asserts that the judge and prosecution worked together, knowing they’d have more success with an all-white jury.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.