Themes: Power and Ethics
In one sense, Julius Caesar is a meditation on the idea of power. In the play’s universe, even when radiating from a single person or ruler, power manifests itself through the people. The political structures in the play have vestiges of democracy, and democratic power is what the play’s highest ideas try to defend. However, does the mantle of democracy immunize power against corruption? What is unique about Julius Caesar’s treatment of power is that the play does not offer conclusive answers to these thorny questions, leaving them open-ended.
The theater of power in the play always includes the masses as a participating audience. Tellingly, the play opens in a public setting, where commoners are celebrating Caesar’s homecoming on the street. The opinion of the masses is always filtered and censored by their leaders, as in the case of Marullus and Flavius, the tribunes who instruct the masses not to celebrate Caesar. Thus, though the will of the people is important, those in power constantly try to police it. Brutus, who forms the center of ethical politics in the play, is convinced he is acting in the public interest of the Romans, yet he kills Caesar in the enclosed private space of the Senate and not on the street. Thus, he is well aware that he is taking a decision on behalf of Rome, with the vast majority of Romans knowing of the decision only after the fact.
Antony represents another kind of political leader, the charismatic orator who manipulates the public for his own ends. Though he may be popular, his moral authority is ambiguous. In the manner in which Antony whips the masses into bloodlust at Caesar’s funeral, there is a remarkable prescience about twentieth-century dictators like Benito Mussolini. Thus, what moves the masses may not be good for them or others. That which appeals to the reason of the people is infinitely better, to borrow Brutus’s favorite word. Brutus believes that the masses share his love for reason. However, the masses are governed less by reason than by emotion and may not always be ethically sound, as is revealed in their gruesome murder of the poet Cinna.
In Julius Caesar, Caesar’s tendency toward tyranny is not merely a fabrication of his enemies. Caesar’s increasing tendency to refer to himself in the third person, describe himself in a hyperbolic mode as the “North Star,” and dismiss the concerns of his well-wishers show his ambition is indeed excessive. However, the conspirators who desire to overthrow Caesar are not as noble as they’d like to be considered, not even Brutus. The flaws in their characters and strategy plunge Rome into chaos and unnecessary strife. The answer does not lie in Mark Antony either, whose dynamism is tempered by opportunism, such as when he diverts some of Caesar’s bequests to himself. The play—and history—suggests young Octavius Caesar is the answer. However, this hope is merely hinted at, and power in the universe of Julius Caesar remains a dangerous entity unless handled with a mixture of nobility and pragmatism.
Expert Q&A
Analyze the theme of power in Julius Caesar.
In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare treats the theme of power with great complexity. He examines the desire to acquire power, but he also examines the vulnerability and political instability which can accompany its pursuit. This complexity is powerfully illustrated in the example of Caesar, the most powerful political force in Rome, facing his conspirators. This pattern repeats in the fates of Cassius and Brutus who, after killing Caesar, are later destroyed by the enemies they made in the process.
Does Julius Caesar illustrate the view that politics is a dirty game?
Julius Caesar illustrates that politics is a dirty game by showcasing the extreme measures politicians take, such as assassination, to achieve their goals. The Senate's decision to murder Caesar rather than trust the democratic process exemplifies the ruthless and manipulative nature of political power struggles, paralleling historical events like the assassinations of JFK and Abraham Lincoln.
How does the quote "Language is a powerful weapon, and in the hands of a skilled person, it can be used to manipulate others" relate to acts 1 and 2 of Julius Caesar?
"Language is a powerful weapon, and in the hands of a skilled person, it can be used to manipulate others."
What do the conspirators proclaim to justify Caesar's death?
The conspirators justify Caesar's death by proclaiming it as an act of liberation from tyranny, with Cinna and Cassius emphasizing the restoration of freedom. Brutus argues that Caesar's ambition threatened the republic, and their action spared him a life of fear and ensured Rome's freedom. He appeals to the citizens by stating that he loved Rome more than Caesar, suggesting they now live as free men rather than slaves under Caesar's rule.
Discuss the compatibility of ambition and honor in Julius Caesar concerning Brutus, Cassius, and Caesar.
What do the conspirators believe they achieved by killing Caesar?
The conspirators believed that by killing Caesar, they would achieve freedom from tyranny and restore the Roman Republic. They feared Caesar's ambition and potential to become a dictator, as he had taken the unprecedented title of "dictator for life," threatening Republican traditions. Brutus, driven by a sense of duty to Rome, and Cassius, motivated by personal animosity, both saw his assassination as a necessary act for Rome's greater good, though their idealism was ultimately proven misguided.
Who is the most Machiavellian character seeking Rome's best interest in Julius Caesar?
In "Julius Caesar," Antony is the most Machiavellian character, focusing primarily on his own power rather than Rome's best interest. Initially, he aligns with Caesar, then adeptly maneuvers to gain favor with Brutus and the Conspirators. His funeral oration for Caesar wins public support. In Act IV, Antony's strategic plotting with Octavius against Lepidus and others reveals his cold, calculating nature, embodying the Machiavellian principle that "the end justifies the means."
The roles and examination of power and ambition in Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar examines power and ambition through its characters and their actions. Caesar's ambition for power leads to his assassination, while Brutus and Cassius's desire to control Rome drives them to betrayal. The play explores how the pursuit of power can corrupt individuals and incite conflict, ultimately questioning the moral consequences of political ambition.
The power of speech and the written word in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare highlights the power of speech and the written word through pivotal moments, such as Brutus and Antony's speeches. These speeches sway public opinion and incite action, underscoring how rhetoric can influence and manipulate. The play demonstrates the profound impact of persuasive language in shaping political and social landscapes.
Which characters in Julius Caesar abandon morals under authority's influence?
Two characters in Julius Caesar who suggest that humans are willing to abandon their morals if an authority figure tells them to do so are Cassius and Mark Antony. Cassius knowingly sways the noble Brutus to his cause in act 1, and Antony turns the fickle crowd against the conspirators in act 3.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
