James Shirley

Start Free Trial


Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

James Shirley was born in London in September, 1596. He received a standard classical education at the Merchant Taylors’ School from 1608 to 1612, and he may have attended St. John’s College, Oxford. He matriculated at St. Catherine’s College, Cambridge, in 1615, received the bachelor of arts degree in 1617, and continued working for his master of arts at Cambridge. After receiving his M.A., he was ordained in the Anglican church, married Elizabeth Gilmet, with whom he had two daughters and a son, and took a curacy in Lincolnshire. He left this post to become headmaster of a grammar school in St. Albans, about which time he converted to Catholicism. Among the fruits of Shirley’s work as a schoolmaster, which preceded and followed his career as a dramatist, are several grammar texts. His first published work was the 1618 narrative poem Eccho, and his 1646 Poems &c. by James Shirley includes both witty verse and poetry in the Ovidian tradition. Shirley is remembered, however, primarily as a prolific playwright who dominated the Caroline stage.

In 1625, Shirley came to London and took up lodging in Gray’s Inn. A favorite of Queen Henrietta Maria, he wrote during the next decade twenty-two of his thirty-one extant plays for Queen Henrietta’s Men, Christopher Beeton’s company at the Phoenix. When the theaters were closed in 1636 because of the plague, Shirley went to Ireland and stayed until 1640, writing plays and managing John Ogilby’s St. Werburgh Street playhouse in Dublin.

This self-exile may have cost him the poet laureateship, which became vacant when Ben Jonson died in 1637 and was awarded the following year to William Davenant. Shirley returned to England in 1640 and succeeded Philip Massinger as principal playwright of the King’s Men at Blackfriars. Only three of his plays for the company had been produced when the Puritans closed the theaters in 1642 and effectively ended his career as a dramatist. During his seventeen-year career he wrote more than forty comedies, tragedies, tragicomedies, and masques, primarily for the privileged audiences of London’s private stages. Soon after the civil war began, Shirley fled with a patron, William Cavendish (later the duke of Newcastle), and fought against Oliver Cromwell for two years. When he came back to London about 1645, he resumed teaching, married for a second time (his first wife apparently having died), and continued to write occasional masques, grammar texts, and poetry. In the Great Fire of London, he and his wife, Frances, were severely burned and fled to St. Giles in the Fields, Middlesex, where they died on October 29, 1666.

Coming late in the golden age of Renaissance drama, Shirley was no innovator but wrote in the manner of his Elizabethan predecessors: the revenge tragedy of Thomas Kyd and John Webster, the city comedy of Thomas Dekker and Philip Massinger, the humors comedy of Ben Jonson, and the tragicomedy of Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher. His tragedies reflect the decadence of the serious drama of the period. His comedies, on the other hand, not only recall the past but also look forward to Restoration comedies of manners by George Etherege, William Wycherley, and William Congreve. Exploiting proven themes, devices, and character types of others while creating dramas uniquely his own, Shirley was largely responsible for the continued vitality of the Renaissance drama into the 1640’s. His antilicentiousness links him to the Elizabethans more closely than to the Restoration playwrights, for though his plays are not homiletic, he rewards virtue and encourages reformation. In his realistic and urbane comedies of manners, which are peopled by recognizable types, he usually dramatizes...

(This entire section contains 941 words.)

See This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

the contrasting values of town, country, and court.

The Cardinal is one of his memorable works, a revenge tragedy echoing Webster’s The Duchess of Malfi (pr. 1614), Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy (pr. c. 1585-1589), John Ford’s The Broken Heart(pr. c. 1627-1631), and even William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (pr. c. 1600-1601). Like these antecedents, it includes the murder of a rival, support for the murderer by a Machiavellian villain, madness (feigned or real) as a result of grief, a play-within-a-play, and revenge as an obsessive motive.

His other noteworthy plays are the comedies Hyde Park and The Lady of Pleasure. The former probably premiered to coincide with the seasonal opening of Hyde Park, a favorite London gathering place and sporting center which recently had become a public facility. The three plots have a common device: A woman is pursued by two rivals, within the triangle her position changes unexpectedly, and the suitor surprisingly is unsuccessful. With its Enoch Arden motif, termagant woman, verbal sparring, and conversion of a lecher, Hyde Park is a lively portrait of Cavalier London. The Lady of Pleasure also is a highly entertaining, fast-paced comedy of manners about London’s upper classes and their pastimes. Shirley develops in it variations on the theme of honor, and the play may be a commentary upon a Platonic love cult in the Caroline court. Perhaps because of its satire, the play was not popular with contemporary audiences, but later playwrights adapted plot elements, characters, and even dialogue from it for their use. Most notable is Richard Brinsley Sheridan’s indebtedness in his 1777 The School for Scandal, whose Sir Peter and Lady Teazle are descendants of Shirley’s Sir Thomas Bornwell and his wife, Aretina; the conceit of the scandal school also owes something to Shirley.

Perhaps the most telling measure of his success as a dramatist is the fact that Shirley, unlike most of his Renaissance predecessors and contemporaries, had the satisfaction of seeing his works revived successfully in the 1660’s, though occasionally adapted and presented as if by current playwrights.


Critical Essays