James Schuyler

Start Free Trial

Some New Strain

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In the following essay, Andrew Motion critiques James Schuyler's poetic style, noting that while it aims to authentically capture mundane details, it often succumbs to sentimentality and subjectivity, resulting in a tedious experience for readers and a restrictive approach for the poet.

Like Frank O'Hara and John Ashbery, Schuyler started life as a poet in the New York School, and has always sought to make a virtue of observing [and recording] random details and attitudes as simply as possible….

The point of this style is that it transforms nothing. And that, as Schuyler must be fed up with hearing, is also its problem. Sentimentality, mawkishness, stupidity and boastfulness are all writ large—so much so that they dwarf the occasional intelligent remark or moment of lyrical intensity. But the consequence is not only pulverising boredom for the reader—particularly in the 60-page title poem. It's also frustration for the writer. The ostensible purpose of concentrating on the quotidian is 'to say, to see and say, things / as they are'. But in practice every 'thing' he sees is mutilated and crushed by the remorseless subjectivity he brings to bear on it. (p. 22)

Andrew Motion, "Some New Strain," in New Statesman (© 1980 The Statesman & Nation Publishing Co. Ltd.), Vol. 100, No. 2583, September 26, 1980, pp. 21-2.∗

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Previous

Notes on Current Books: 'The Morning of the Poem'

Next

New Books in Review: 'The Morning of the Poem'

Loading...