Biography
Irving Howe made his mark as an editor, literary critic, and political writer. He was born into a working-class family in New York City on June 11, 1920, the son of Jewish immigrants from Russia, David and Nettie (Goldman) Howe. The major influence on Irving’s youth was Max Schachtman, a Polish-born disciple of Leon Trotsky. After receiving his bachelor’s degree from City College of New York in 1940, Irving, who profoundly admired Trotsky, turned to full-time writing and editing for Labor Action, the periodical of Schachtman’s newly founded Workers’ Party.
Howe was drafted into the U.S. Army in 1942 and posted in Alaska. In 1946, after his discharge, Howe began to write literary criticism for periodicals outside Schachtman’s orbit, such as Commentary, The Nation, and the leftist literary magazine Partisan Review; in 1948 he became a book reviewer for Time magazine. In 1951 his study of the Midwestern short-story writer Sherwood Anderson was published; a book on the southern writer William Faulkner came out the following year; and in 1957 there appeared Politics and the Novel, a series of essays dealing with the treatment of ideology in fiction. In 1953 Howe was appointed professor of English at Brandeis University; later he taught at Stanford University from 1961 to 1963 and, after 1963, at City University of New York.
Although Howe broke with Schachtman politically in 1952, he refused to embrace the then-fashionable notion that Socialist ideology was no longer relevant to American life. To provide a Socialist analysis of current affairs, Howe cofounded, in 1954, the magazine Dissent.
From the mid-1960’s onward, Howe criticized the New Leftists, who gained support by opposing the Vietnam War, for what he considered to be moral absolutism and a dangerous naïveté about Communism. As a literary critic, Howe opposed the cultural radicalism of the 1960’s as well. In the last section of a 1968 essay, “The New York Intellectuals,” reprinted in Decline of the New, he attacked what he saw as the irrationalism of those artists and writers popularly known as the counterculture.
After the demise of the New Left, Howe, who had now begun to criticize the United States’ drift toward political conservatism, gradually became more a scholarly chronicler of the Socialist tradition than an effective advocate for it. Howe’s massive history of the Eastern European immigrant Jews of New York City, World of Our Fathers: The Journey of the Eastern European Jews to America and the Life They Found and Made, became a best-seller. Other historical works followed: a biography of Trotsky in 1978, Socialism and America in 1985, and a book on nineteenth century American intellectual history called The American Newness: Culture and Politics in the Age of Emerson in 1986. His A Margin of Hope: An Intellectual Autobiography, appeared in 1982.
In Politics and the Novel Howe extols as literary role models the Englishman George Orwell and the Italian Ignazio Silone, both believers in a humane and liberal socialism. Despite his strong political convictions, however, Howe tries to balance political and artistic criteria in his judgment of works of literature. In “Literature and Liberalism,” reprinted in Celebrations and Attacks, Howe concedes that, apart from the dissident writers of Communist-dominated Europe after 1945, the great twentieth century European writers have generally been indifferent or hostile to democratic values. Although the French novelist Louis-Ferdinand Céline, discussed in essays in both A World More Attractive and Celebrations and Attacks, and the American poet Ezra Pound, treated in an essay in The Critical Point , were Fascists and anti-Semites, Howe recognizes some virtue,...
(This entire section contains 1133 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
however flawed, in their literary output.
Howe ascribes the pessimism in Sherwood Anderson’s fiction to his upbringing in a small town left behind by economic growth, and he sees William Faulkner’s questioning of inherited southern myths as a response to the challenge posed to southern traditions by both the values of the industrialized North and the beginnings of southern industrialization. He views English novelist Thomas Hardy’s origins in a rural part of an industrializing England as one source of the creative tension lying behind such novels as Jude the Obscure (1895). Howe perceives this struggle to make the wrenching transition from traditional to modern society not only in the lives of Faulkner and Hardy and in the characters of their fiction but also in the lives of Jewish immigrants to New York. In his World of Our Fathers, Howe attributes marital desertion among the immigrants to their sudden liberation from the rigid social controls of the traditional Eastern European Jewish small town. The Socialist movement, Howe argues, rebuilt among the immigrants the sense of community shattered by the traumatic transition to a new, urban-industrial society.
Over the years Howe reassessed both the feasibility and the desirability of Socialism. In a 1954 essay, “Images of Socialism,” reprinted in A World More Attractive, Howe argues that a future Socialist society will not be free of all conflict, contrary to some Marxists’ notions. In Leon Trotsky the mature Howe, while still insisting that workers’ control over the economy is compatible with democracy, expresses skepticism about such hallowed Marxist doctrines as the revolutionary mission of the proletariat and the need for public ownership of industry. To the Howe of the 1980’s a major reason for the failure of Socialism to take root in the United States is the deep-rooted faith, shared by both reformers and conservatives, in America as the promised land of individual freedom. Yet in both Socialism and America and The American Newness Howe voices the wistful hope that what is valuable in American individualism might somehow be reconciled with the democratic Socialist ideal.
Many on the Left regarded Howe’s attacks on the New Left as intemperate; younger literary critics deplored his polemics against the counterculture as indiscriminate. Neoconservatives, who applauded Howe’s views on the New Left and the counterculture, disparaged as blind and irrational his faith in Socialism. Even Howe’s most widely praised book, World of Our Fathers, was said by some to have overemphasized the role of the Socialist movement and the trade unions in the immigrant subculture.
Although many admired Howe’s indifference to intellectual fashion, few ever regarded him as a seminal thinker. Howe failed to inspire younger generations of academic literary critics or historians. He was part of the second generation of New York intellectuals, born some ten to fifteen years after the first pioneering generation that is associated with the Partisan Review. Although his Politics and the Novel is innovative in subject matter if not in methods, Howe produced no truly original critical theory; his gift was that of popularizing complex ideas. Similarly, World of Our Fathers derives its value not from startlingly new interpretations, or from the use of new research methods, but from the author’s ability to bring insights from his own experience to bear upon the past and from his exceptionally lucid prose style.
Criticism by Irving Howe
-
A Protest of His Own
James Baldwin Criticism
-
The Suburbs of Babylon
Philip Roth Criticism
-
Philip Roth Reconsidered
Philip Roth Criticism
-
Flannery O'Connor's Stories
Flannery O'Connor Criticism
-
Richard Wright: A Word of Farewell
Richard Wright Criticism
-
I. B. Singer
Isaac Bashevis Singer Criticism
-
Stories: New, Old and Sometimes Good
Isaac Bashevis Singer Criticism
-
The Straight and the Crooked: Solzhenitsyn and Lukacs
Georg Lukács Criticism
-
Irving Howe
Ishmael Reed Criticism
-
Some Words for a Master
Luigi Pirandello Criticism
-
A Grave and Solitary Voice: An Appreciation of Edwin Arlington Robinson
Edwin Arlington Robinson Criticism
-
One Can Stand Up to Lies
Václav Havel Criticism
-
A Man of Letters
Edmund Wilson Criticism
-
A Happy Match
V. S. Pritchett Criticism
-
The Religious Novel
François Mauriac Criticism
-
'The New Yorker' & Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arendt Criticism
-
The Moral History of Czeslaw Milosz
Czesław Miłosz Criticism
-
Writing and the Holocaust: How Literature Has (and Has Not) Met Its Greatest Challenge
Tadeusz Borowski Criticism
-
Response to Ted Solotaroff: The End of Marginality in Jewish Literature
Jewish-American Fiction Criticism
-
Lillian Hellman and the McCarthy Years
Lillian Hellman Criticism
-
The Stranger and the Victim: The Two Jewish Stereotypes of American Fiction
Jewish-American Fiction Criticism
-
Irving Howe
Henry Green Criticism
-
W. E. B. Du Bois: Glory and Shame
W. E. B. Du Bois Criticism
-
Fueling the Passarola
José Saramago Criticism
-
A Captive Not Quite Freed
Howard Fast Criticism
-
Sholom Aleichem: Voice of Our Past
Sholom Aleichem Criticism
-
Purity and Craftiness
Delmore Schwartz Criticism
-
An Afterword
Steven Millhauser Criticism
-
Life Never Let Up
Henry Roth Criticism
-
Malraux, Silone, Koestler: The Twentieth Century
Arthur Koestler Criticism
-
Correlation of Farces
Vassily Aksyonov Criticism
-
Literature on the Couch
Leslie Fiedler Criticism
-
Brod on Kafka
Max Brod Criticism
-
A Major Discovery
Der Nister Criticism
-
Beyond Bitterness
Varlam Shalamov Criticism
-
God, Man, and Stalin
Whittaker Chambers Criticism
-
Last Exit to L.A.
Daniel Fuchs Criticism
-
Books: 'West of the Rockies'
Daniel Fuchs Criticism
-
Philip Rahv: A Memoir
Philip Rahv Criticism
-
The Cost of Obedience
Jurek Becker Criticism