Masterplots II: Juvenile & Young Adult Literature Series The Invisible Man Analysis
Griffin is so absorbed in his own views that he does not detect the revulsion that Kemp feels for his colleague’s murderous plans. Griffin means to use science as an instrument of coercion; the scientist will become a dictator, deciding who shall live and who shall die. He sees no irony in the fact that his great discovery has made him invisible to humanity. His breakthrough literally separates him from the rest of the human race, which treats him as a frightening alien. He, in turn, no longer feels any bond with his fellow human beings.
That Kemp should triumph over Griffin suggests natural limitations to the damage that a scientist like Griffin can inflict on society. Intelligence without moral vision runs amok. To be smart without also being sensitive to others virtually guarantees that Griffin will not be able to find a partner for his studies. Kemp triumphs because he recognizes that ideas in isolation from society can prove lethal.
Wells’s work is prophetic not only about the dangers of the single-minded pursuit of science but also about the need for cooperation and the sharing of knowledge. Griffin’s instinct is to hide what he knows, and only when he is desperate does he seek a confederate. Even then, he shuts out the possibility that Kemp might have a different view. Such authoritarianism, in itself, constitutions the defeat of the very scientific quest that Griffin initiates.
Griffin fails to gain Kemp’s...
(The entire section is 552 words.)