illustration of a wolf standing in the forest looking toward a fallen tree that has pinned a man underneath

The Interlopers

by Saki

Start Free Trial

Why is the ending of "The Interlopers" ironic?

Quick answer:

The ending of "The Interlopers" is ironic because Ulrich and Georg shout, thinking this will bring other men to save them, but instead it brings a pack of wolves to destroy them. It is also ironic because it shows that the feud over "ownership" of the land is pointless. Nature owns the land, and the wolves will soon "own" the men as dinner.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Situational irony is when the opposite of what is expected occurs, while verbal irony is when words mean the opposite of what they seemingly state. The ending of "The Interlopers" uses both situational and verbal irony.

At the end of the story, Georg and Ulrich, both trapped under a fallen tree in the wintry woods, decide to shout for help. They soon see figures coming and happily believe their ploy has been successful in attracting attention. It has been successful but, ironically, in a way that is unwanted and unexpected by either of them. They have attracted the attention of a pack of wolves who are coming to devour them.

Because they see nine or ten figures approaching, they assume it is Ulrich's men. Ulrich says,

They are making all the speed they can, brave lads.

This turns out to be an ironic statement. Ulrich will very soon be the opposite of glad that the "lads" are speeding towards them.

However, the situational irony goes deeper than just the fact that the shouting has had the opposite of the intended effect. The larger situation of the two men feuding bitterly over this piece of land is turned on its head as they both realize neither of them can claim "ownership" over nature. The wolves are not for a moment going to respect either man's "right" to the land or accept that they are "trespassing" on another being's "property." Nature, Saki is saying, can't be owned by humans. Ironically, the wolves will soon own the humans as dinner, proving that the two men, together, are the true "interlopers."

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The ending of “The Interlopers” provides an excellent example of situational irony (when the result of a situation is different from what you expect the result to be). In the story, Ulrich and Georg are the heads of their families and they have a long-standing feud that was fueled even more strongly by their time as boys together. When the two become trapped one night, pinned down by trees in a forest together, they eventually decide to “bury the old quarrel” and become friends. The two endeavor to call for help, now satisfied in their reconciliation and eager to be saved together.

The irony comes when Ulrich spots a group of figures approaching them in the darkness. He proclaims that these figures are “running down the hills” towards the two trapped men. In this situation, one might expect a group of people to arrive and free the men so that the feud between their families can finally end. However, this is not what happens. Instead, Ulrich laughs, “the idiotic chattering of a man unstrung with hideous fear.” When questioned by Georg as to the identity of the figures, Ulrich says simply, “Wolves.” The irony here is that instead of being saved, it is implied that the men will be eaten by wolves. These two men achieve reconciliation only to be killed by natural forces. At the beginning of the story, they wished to kill each other—to face one another man-to-man. In the end, a wolf presumably does the job for them. When they remove their conflict and are no longer a threat to one another, that is precisely when nature enters and presents a new threat.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The ending of the story is ironic because Ulrich and Georg call for help and think that their men are coming to help them, but they can’t see clearly. They are relieved at first, but the reader is left with a sense of dread as they realize there are actually wolves running towards them. They have no chance of survival, considering they are stuck under the tree.

The irony is that when the story begins, Ulrich and Georg are the biggest threats to each other, but once they decide to be friends and remove the main conflict, nature takes charge, and there is no controlling nature. First, the tree almost kills them. Then, when they finally resolve their issues with each other, it doesn’t matter because they can’t stand up to the wolves. This irony emphasizes the theme of the story: humans believe they are in control, but nature is, in fact, in control.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Is there irony in the story "The Interlopers"?

"The Interlopers" is a story rich in situational irony, with events continually twisting in directions quite contrary to the expectations of the people caught up within them. This story is shaped by a personal feud. Two men are walking through a disputed forest, each hoping to bring violence upon the other. However, in the moment the two come face to face (when one might expect a confrontation to ensue), nature intervenes and the two are trapped together beneath a fallen tree. Each man is trapped, equally helpless in the presence of the other.

From here their relationship changes, as the two began to sympathize with one another. Eventually, they cast aside their earlier antagonism and determine that from this moment forward, they should become friends. You might expect, then, that this encounter has resulted in a new future for the two adversaries, but Saki has one more brutal twist in the making.

As the story approaches its end, the two men, hoping for rescue, start shouting for help. Their efforts succeed in drawing attention, though not in the way they had hoped. Here we find Saki's final irony: rather than their shouts having drawn the attention of rescuers, as they had expected, the story ends with the approach of wolves.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Why is "The Interlopers" an ironic story?

In my opinion, the major instance of irony in this story is the situational irony that comes at the end of the story.  Situational irony can be defined as a disconnect between what you would expect and what actually happens.  To me, the ending definitely fits this definition.

As the story draws to a close, I (at least) expect that the two men have resolved their conflict and will become friends.  I assume that someone will find them and get the tree off of them.  This assumption sets up the irony at the end.  Instead of being found and saved and becoming friends, the two men are found by wolves and are presumably going to be eaten.

So the ending takes my expectations and turns them on their head -- situational irony.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Why is "The Interlopers" an ironic story?

"The Interlopers" is ironic in several ways, but the most powerful is probably the ending. These men have been enemies for some time. They had been hunting humans, we are told.

Once in the crisis, each was hoping for others to come, first to kill the other, and then to prove them right and moral, and when they see others coming they cry for help, after they've reached a new peace. And who comes? Wolves—to kill them after they've finally made peace. That's irony!

Greg

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on