illustration of a wolf standing in the forest looking toward a fallen tree that has pinned a man underneath

The Interlopers

by Saki

Start Free Trial

What are the two main conflicts in "The Interlopers" and how are they resolved?

Quick answer:

The first conflict is a long-standing family feud between Ulrich and Georg. The second conflict is between the two men and the wolves who appear on the horizon.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The two main conflicts in the story are man against man and man against nature. Specifically, the first conflict is Ulrich against Georg. Ulrich legally owns the land that once, three generations ago, was under the control of Georg's family. Georg responds to the generational feud by poaching and hatred; Ulrich responds with equal hatred and guarding against Georg's poaching. This night, Ulrich suspects Georg's poachers are on the land because all the animals are restless and distressed:

The roebuck, which usually kept in the sheltered hollows during a storm-wind, were running like driven things to-night....

The second conflict is Ulrich and Georg both against the fierce winter storm. Its raging, roaring wind sends catastrophe on their heads when a beech branch breaks and crashes on them while they stand face-to-face with raging urges. They both want to end the feud through murder. Now, not only is each man raging in the company of his greatest foes, each is held helplessly captive by the raging storm.

The conflicts are related to each other because Ulrich would not have been out in the storm if Georg hadn't been poaching and distressing all the wildlife, while Georg would not have been poaching had not the court awarded the contested land, which was held in his family's control, to the family of Ulrich three generations earlier. Neither man would have been there in nature—in the forest—if either family or either man had forgiven, ended the feud, and been friends before that night.

[Georg] "We fight this quarrel out to the death, you and I and our foresters, with no cursed interlopers to come between us."

The man against nature conflict is resolved in a shocking way. Saki's surprise ending--which constitutes an end-of-story climax surprise ending--is more of a shock ending, for the horrified gasp it elicits in readers, but it is in the surprise ending that this conflict is resolved.

The man against man conflict is resolved earlier when Ulrich takes pity on Georg's suffering and offers him a drink of wine from his own flask, taken from his coat pocket at great pain. Georg refuses the wine. Nonetheless, Ulrich contemplates the folly of their behavior and offers friendship. After a long thoughtful silence, Georg replies that the "whole region would stare and gabble" if they made a friendship with each other. Georg then says that he has changed his mind, too, and accepts friendship.

[Ulrich] "Neighbour, if you will help me to bury the old quarrel I--I will ask you to be my friend."
[Georg] "I think I have changed my mind about things too, this last half-hour. And you offered me your wine-flask . . . Ulrich von Gradwitz, I will be your friend."

After they together "raised their voices in a prolonged hunting call" to summon their men to find them, Ulrich sees shapes advancing at a run, "making all the speed they can, brave lads." Georg asks, "Are they your men?" Ulrich in an "idiotic chattering laugh" says, "No." The shapes running to them to save them are wolves. The wolves of the shocking surprise ending resolve the man against nature conflict. After triumphing over the man against man conflict by laying down their feud and their hatred and by making friends, these men tragically lose to the power of nature.

   "Are they your men?" asked Georg. "Are they your men?" he repeated impatiently as Ulrich did not answer.
   "No," said Ulrich with a laugh, the idiotic chattering laugh of a man unstrung with hideous fear.
   "Who are they?" asked Georg quickly, straining his eyes to see what the other would gladly not have seen.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There are two central conflicts in “The Interlopers,” by Saki. The primary conflict, of course, is the rigid obstinacy of the men, Ulrich and Georg, who fight over a narrow strip of land. The conflict is magnified by the fact that neither man really needs the land. Both have larger tracts of land where they can find better populated forests and a greater variety of game. Still, because their families have feuded over the land for generations, they continue to fight one another. This conflict is resolved when the men share a flask after being trapped beneath the fallen trees. They agree to end the feud and make peace. This, however, does nothing to resolve the other conflict.

The second form of conflict is man versus nature. Both men were in a darkened forest in freezing conditions.  Each chose to spend the evening patrolling the small strip of land, hoping to catch the other and accuse him of trespassing. The dark, the cold weather, the storm and the enormous and imprisoning tree reflect nature’s might against the two enemies. The resolution to this conflict came, of course, in the form of hungry wolves that are drawn to the smell of blood. The wolves represent nature’s final blow against the men and the men’s deaths will represent a clear and decisive victory. 

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the two main conflicts in "The Interlopers"? How are they related and how are they resolved?

The two main conflicts in "The Interlopers" are interconnected in ironic ways. First of all, the long-standing conflict that exists between the two men, Ulrich and Georg, takes the form of a bitter family feud over issues of land and ownership. The second conflict is between the two men and the wolves who appear on the horizon, a manifestation of nature.

These two conflicts, the first involving man v. man and the second involving man v. nature, are related in their pointlessness. Ulrich and Georg are involved in a terrible argument that has nothing to do with their own personal preferences; the conflict originated years before they ever got involved, and so their continuation of the conflict is unnecessary. When the two men become trapped by the tree, another manifestation of nature, they reconcile, but their reconciliation comes too late; the wolves are sure to kill them, which makes even their mutual forgiveness pointless because their families will never learn of their peacemaking.

The conflicts are certainly resolved, but the resolutions are far from satisfactory. The men forgive each other and resolve their conflict interpersonally, just in time for nature to take control and render the men's resolution insignificant.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the two main conflicts in "The Interlopers"? How are they related and how are they resolved?

In this story, I think that the main conflicts are

  1. the conflict between the two main characters, Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym
  2. the conflict between these two men, on the one hand, and nature on the other.

The conflict between the two men is an old one that is based on a dispute about whose land it is.  This one is resolved by them deciding to be friendly to each other after the tree has fallen on them.

This conflict relates to the other because the first conflict causes them to be out on this stormy night and that's when the tree falls on them.

The other conflict is not resolved so nicely.  It seems to be resolved by the wolves eating the men.  (We don't see this, but it seems the likely outcome...)

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the two main conflicts in "The Interlopers"? How are they related and how are they resolved?

The two main conflicts in the Saki short story "The Interlopers" are man versus man, and man versus nature. The boundary dispute between Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz had been settled by the courts in previous a generations, and yet each successive generation still fought over the land. The most recent generations fought even more zealously over this land despite its lack of merit in that it "...was not remarkable for the game it harboured or the shooting it afforded...," and yet, Georg continued to poach at will. Gradwitz suspected this, and because  this land, "...was the most jealously guarded of all its owner's territorial possessions," he hunted Georg.

The nature of the men is portrayed as beastly in that they both "thirsted for the other's blood." It is this blood lust that brings them face to face during the stormy night when most other beasts of the wood remained hidden. At this point nature interjects and the men find themselves engaged in a life and death struggle of man versus nature. Trapped beneath a tree, both men seem to have a change of heart as they consider how life might be different if they were to become friends. Thus, man versus man is resolved.

Saki leaves resolution of man versus nature up to the inference of the reader. As the men contemplate their rescue, they see shapes running towards them. Drawn by their cries or the scent of their blood--"Wolves." 

Enotes has a great study guide at the following link.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the two main conflicts in "The Interlopers"? How are they related and how are they resolved?

Ah, good question. One main conflict is between the representatives of the two feuding families about rights to the land: Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz.

The other main conflict is between these two men and nature (a struggle to survive).

They relate by the way they are resolved: they are about to make relative peace and start a new era (ending the feud one way) when wolves come on them (implying the land itself will put an end to their feud another way: by killing them).

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on